PERMANENT STATUS PROGRAM REVIEW (PSPR)

Ed.S. in School Psychology

Prepared by Marika Ginsburg-Block Ph.D., Program Coordinator

Fall 2011

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

I.                    PERMANENT STATUS REQUEST FORM…………………………………3

II.                 FACULTY SENATE RESOLUTION………………………………………..6

III.               ORIGINAL PROGRAM PROPOSAL……………………………………….7

IV.              GRADUATE PROGRAM POLICY DOCUMENT.………………………..11

V.                 ASSESSMENT OF LIBRARY RESOURCES……………………………..23

VI.              SELF STUDY REPORT

1.      GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROGRAM………………27

                        A.        INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY…………………………….27

                        B.         UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC PRIORITIES……………………...29

                        C.        GENERAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS………………….30

                        D.        CURRICULAR REQUIREMENTS……………………………..30

                        E.         RESULTS OF PROGRAM QUALITY ASSESSMENTS………34

                        F.         STUDENT ADVISEMENT STRATEGIES…………………….37

                        G.        PROGRAM ACCREDITATION REQUIREMENTS………..…40

                        H.        ADMISSION CRITERIA AND DEGREE REQUIREMENT…..40

                        I.          RECRUITING PROCEDURES…………………………………42

2.      STUDENT INFORMATION

                        A.        APPLICATION AND ENROLLMENT HISTORY…………….43

                        B.         PLACEMENT OF GRADUATES………………………………44

                        C.        FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR STUDENTS…………………….44

3.      FACTORS FOR ATTRACTING STUDENTS………………………….45

4.      PROGRAM UNIQUENESS…………………………………………….45

5.      INTERDISCIPLINARY RELATIONSHIPS……………………………46

6.      PROGRAM FACILITIES……………………………………………….46

7.      BUDGETARY REQUIREMENTS……………………………………...46

8.      OTHER INFORMATION

A.                 Assessments Used to Measure Program Quality………………...47

B.                 Assessment 1: Praxis II Scores…………………………………..50

C.                 Assessment 2: Course Grades……………………………………55

D.                 Assessment 3: Practicum Ratings………………………………..59

E.                  Assessment 4: Internship ratings………………………………...72

F.                  Assessment 5: Internship Portfolio………………………………87

G.                 Assessment 6: Comprehensive Case Study……………………...97

H.                 Assessment 7: Alumni Survey………………………………….100

I.                    NASP/NCATE Feedback on Program Assessment Tools……...111

J.                   Program response to NASP Standard 1………………………...112

 

 

 

VII.            APPENDICES

            APPENDIX A: ORIGINAL APPLICATION FOR PROVISIONAL                                      APPROVAL…………………………………………………………....122

            APPENDIX B: TRANSCRIPT OF OPEN HEARINGS……………………....126

            APPENDIX C: FACULTY SENATE CONCERNS……………………….….127

            APPENDIX D: LETTERS OF SUPPORT……………………………………..128

            APPENDIX E: PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT……………………………...130

            APPENDIX F: NEW LETTERS OF APPROVAL…………………………….131

                       

 

           

 

 

 


PERMANENT STATUS REQUEST FORM

 

UNIVERSITY FACULTY SENATE FORMS

 

Academic Program Approval

 

This form is a routing document for the approval of new and revised academic programs.  Proposing department should complete this form.  For more information, call the Faculty Senate Office at 831-2921.

 

 

Submitted by: Marika Ginsburg-Block phone number: 302-831-6631

                               

Department:  School of Education email address: marika@udel.edu_

                                                                                                                                                                                                           

Date:   October 7, 2011

 

Action:  Request for Permanent Status for Ed.S. Degree in School Psychoogy

(Example:  add major/minor/concentration, delete major/minor/concentration,  revise major/minor/concentration,  academic unit name change, request for permanent status, policy change, etc.)

 

Effective term: 12S

                                                (use format 04F, 05W)

 

Current degree: Ed.S.

                                    (Example:  BA, BACH, BACJ, HBA, EDD, MA, MBA, etc.)

 

Proposed change leads to the degree of: Ed.S.

                                                                                             (Example:  BA, BACH, BACJ, HBA, EDD, MA, MBA, etc.)

 

 

Proposed name: Educational Specialist in School Psychology

                                            Proposed new name for revised or new major / minor / concentration / academic unit

                                                                                (if applicable)

 

Revising or Deleting: 

 

Undergraduate major / Concentration:______________________________________

                                                                                    (Example:  Applied Music – Instrumental  degree BMAS)

 

Undergraduate minor:____________________________________________________

                                   (Example:  African Studies,  Business Administration,  English, Leadership, etc.)            

 

Graduate Program Policy statement change: No change requested

                                                                  (Must attach  your Graduate Program Policy Statement)

 

            Graduate Program of Study: Ed.S. School Psychology

                                 (Example:  Animal Science: MS  Animal Science:  PHD  Economics: MA Economics: PHD)

 

 

                Graduate minor / concentration:

 

 

Note: all graduate studies proposals must include an electronic copy of the Graduate Program Policy Document, highlighting the changes made to the original policy document.

 

 

List new courses required for the new or revised curriculum. How do they support the overall program objectives of the major/minor/concentrations)?

 (Be aware that approval of the curriculum is dependent upon these courses successfully passing through the Course Challenge list. If there are no new courses enter “None”) None

 

 

Explain, when appropriate, how this new/revised curriculum supports the 10 goals of undergraduate education: http://www.ugs.udel.edu/gened/

 

N/A

 

Identify other units affected by the proposed changes:

(Attach permission from the affected units.  If no other unit is affected, enter “None”)

 

None

 

Describe the rationale for the proposed program change(s):

(Explain your reasons for creating, revising, or deleting the curriculum or program.)

 

The Educational Specialist degree in school psychology was approved by the Faculty Senate in April 2005 to replace a certificate program in school psychology which was previously offered. The rationale for offering the Educational Specialist degree, based on our 2005 application was: “Students receive a Masters of Arts in School Psychology after the first year (30 credits) and a Specialist Certificate in School Psychology at the end of the third year (which includes a full year internship).  Note that national accreditation requires a minimum of 60 credit hours.  When recently (referring to the review conducted prior to 2005) accredited by NCATE and the National Association of School Psychologists, the accreditation agency recommended that students receive a degree, and not a certificate, upon completion of the 60 hour program.  Note that many other universities offer a Specialist Degree in Education.  Also note that a 30-hour Masters degree, by itself, would be inappropriate, and cost graduates a sizable amount of pay (i.e., salaries are often tied to a “Masters” regardless of the number of hours, but many school districts recognize the Specialist degree and pay accordingly).  A Specialist Degree also would recognize that the graduates have completed far more than what is typically expected in a Masters program.”

 

Beginning with the graduating class of 2006, 45 students have graduated with their 30-credit Educational Specialist degrees from the University of Delaware after having obtained their 30-credit M.A. This degree is the trend followed by other top programs in school psychology. The Educational Specialist Program underwent extensive review by the NCATE and the National Association of School Psychologists receiving full program approval for the maximum allowable period of 5 years in 2006 and again in 2011. Thus, it is requested that the Senate consider granting permanent program status for the Educational Specialist Degree in School Psychology.

 

 

Program Requirements: 

(Show the new or revised curriculum as it should appear in the Course Catalog.  If this is a revision, be sure to indicate the changes being made to the current curriculum and include a side-by-side comparison of the credit distribution before and after the proposed change.)

 

N/A

 

 

 ROUTING AND AUTHORIZATION:        (Please do not remove supporting documentation.)

 

Department Chairperson                                                                                                        Date                                       

 

Dean of College                                                                                                                       Date                                       

 

Chairperson, College Curriculum Committee___________________________________Date_____________________

 

Chairperson, Senate Com. on UG or GR Studies                                                                   Date                                       

 

Chairperson, Senate Coordinating Com.                                                                 Date                                       

 

Secretary, Faculty Senate                                                                                                       Date                                       

 

Date of Senate Resolution                                                                                                      Date to be Effective               

 

Registrar                                                                  Program Code                                         Date                                       

 

Vice Provost for Academic Affairs & International Programs                                               Date                                       

 

Provost                                                                                                                                   Date                                       

 

Board of Trustee Notification                                                                                                                Date                                       

 

Revised 02/09/2009   /khs

 

 

 


FACULTY SENATE RESOLUTION DRAFT

 

WHEREAS, the Educational Specialist Program in School Psychology was provisionally approved in April 2005, and

WHEREAS, at the end of the provisional period an external review team recommended that the Educational Specialist Program in School Psychology be given permanent status, and

WHEREAS, the Educational Specialist Program in School Psychology is one of a select few nationally accredited programs in the region, and

WHEREAS, the high quality of matriculated students has been demonstrated by the consistent receipt of more than 60 applications per year for 8 positions in the program, and

WHEREAS, the Educational Specialist Program in School Psychology is consistent with the Path to Prominence’s emphasis on becoming a premier graduate and professional education university that serves the state of Delaware, be it therefore

RESOLVED, that, effective immediately, the Educational Specialist Program in School Psychology be granted permanent status.

 


ORIGINAL PROGRAM PROPOSAL

 

ACADEMIC PROGRAM APPROVAL

 

                                                                                             CHECKLIST

 

This form is a routing document for the approval of new and revised academic programs.  Page 2 will serve as an attachment to the Faculty Senate agenda.  Proposing department should complete form, attach as a cover page and forward to the college dean. Documentation should include copy of curriculum as it is to appear in the Undergraduate and Graduate Catalog.  Proposals must arrive to the Undergraduate/Graduate Committee by November in order to reach the Faculty Senate by March 1.   Proposals received after this date cannot be implemented the following year nor included in the catalog for that year.

                                                                                                                                                                                                              

1.        Proposed change leads to the degree of

 

(  ) Bachelor of Arts                                ( XX ) Master of Arts                            (  ) Doctor of Philosophy      

 

(  ) Bachelor of Science           (  ) Master of Science              (X  ) Other:  EDUCATIONAL SPECIALIST

 

2.   (  ) New major/curriculum                                                                                                                                                                                                               Title to be entered in record of students who select this program

 

       (  ) New minor                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Title to be entered in record of students who select this program

 

       (  ) Change from provisional to permanent status.

 

 

3.   (x ) Revision of existing:         (x  ) major                          (  ) minor                                 (  ) concentration

 

Present title   M.A./SPECIALIST PROGRAM IN SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY                                                                                                                                                                      

 

Records System Program Code                                                                                                                                           

 

(XX  ) Add/delete required courses/credit hours

 

                (  ) Add concentration                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Title

(  ) Delete concentration                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Title

 

4.  (  ) Deletion of existing/disestablish:    (  ) major               (  ) minor                 ( ) other _______________________________

 

                 Title                                                                                                                              Code______________________                                              

 

5.  (  )  Policy Change____________________________________________________________________________________

                                                Title/Department

 

ROUTING AND APPROVALS: (Please do not remove supporting documentation.)

 

Department Chairperson                                                                                                        Date                                       

 

Dean of College                                                                                                                       Date                                       

 

Chairperson, College Curriculum Committee___________________________________Date_____________________

 

Chairperson, Senate Com. on UG or GR Studies                                                                   Date                                       

 

Chairperson, Senate Coordinating Com.                                                                 Date                                       

 

Secretary, Faculty Senate                                                                                                       Date                                       

 

Date of Senate Resolution                                                                                                      Date to be Effective               

 

Registrar                                                                  Program Code                                         Date                                       

 

Vice Provost for Academic Programs & Planning                                                                  Date                                       

 

Provost                                                                                                                                   Date                                       

 

Board of Trustee Notification                                                                                                                Date                                       

 

a.  Rationale for creation, revision, or  deletion:

 

The School of Education is requesting two changes to the current program:

 

Change #1:  The school psychology program is a 3-year, 60 credit hour program.  Students receive a Masters of Arts in School Psychology after the first year (30 credits) and a Specialist Certificate in School Psychology at the end of the third year (which includes a full year internship).  Note that national accreditation requires a minimum of 60 credit hours.  When recently accredited by NCATE and the National Association of School Psychologists, the accreditation agency recommended that students receive a degree, and not a certificate, upon completion of the 60 hour program.  Note that many other universities offer a Specialist Degree in Education.  Also note that a 30-hour Masters degree, by itself, would be inappropriate, and cost graduates a sizable amount of pay (i.e., salaries are often tied to a “Masters” regardless of the number of hours, but many school districts recognize the Specialist degree and pay accordingly).  A Specialist Degree also would recognize that the graduates have completed far more than what is typically expected in a Masters program.

 

Thus, it is requested that the Senate consider granting the Educational Specialist Degree in School Psychology for graduates who complete the second and third year of the program.  The coursework in these two years combine for a total of 30 credits.  Thus, students who complete the three-year, 60 credit hour program would exit with a M.A. in School Psychology (conferred after the first year, 30 credit hours), and an Ed.S. in School Psychology (conferred after the third year, an additional 30 credit hours).

 

Change #2:  EDUC 658: Classroom Management and Discipline would be added as an alternative of the currently required course EDUC 681: Techniques for Behavior Change.  This change allows for greater flexibility in scheduling and is consistent with recent changes in the national program standards set by the National Association of School Psychologists and NCATE.  That is, a course in behavior modification is not required and our program was encouraged during its recent accreditation review to offer greater training in the foundations of psychology and education (e.g., the educational psychology aspects of EDUC 658.  This change also is consistent with recommendations of students in the program, as indicated in a recent survey.

 

Both courses are routinely offered.  Thus, this change will not require additional resources.

 

 

b.  Summary of program:

 

*FIRST YEAR:  MASTERS OF ARTS

 

FALL                                                                                                                    CREDITS                                                              

 

EDUC 618       Special Services in the Schools                                                 3                                 

EDUC 817       Individual Intelligence Testing                                                    3

EDUC 663       Counseling Skills Lab                                                                            3

EDUC 681       Techniques of Behavior Change OR

EDUC 658      Classroom Management and Discipline                                           3

                                                                       

WINTER SESSION

 

EDUC 623       Applied Human Development                                                   3

EDUC 680       Educational Diagnosis                                                               3

                                   

SPRING

 

EDUC 660       Educational Statistics and Measurement                                                3

EDUC 671       Practicum in School Psychology                                                            3                                                                     

EDUC 679       Methods in Special Education                                                   3

EDUC 814       Psychological Assessment of Children OR

PSYC 820       Psychodiagnostics: Objective Trait and Behavioral Assessment  3                                                         

                                                           

TOTAL CREDITS FOR M.A. IN SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY                             30

 

COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION REQUIRED AT END OF FIRST YEAR

 

*The completion of the M.A. does not convey certification as a school psychologist.  To be certified, students must complete the second year coursework and a supervised internship and must then apply for certification in the state in which they wish to practice. The University’s Institutional Recommendation is issued at the successful completion of the supervised internship.

 

                                               

SECOND and THIRD YEARS:  Education Specialist Degree in School Psychology

 

FALL                                                                                                                   CREDITS

 

EDUC 671       Practicum in School Psychology                                                            3                                             

EDUC 691       Applied Statistics   & Research Design                                      3

EDUC 831       Advanced Counseling Techniques                                                         3

EDUC 870       Child Neuropsychology                                                                        3

 

SPRING         

 

EDUC 671       Practicum in School Psychology                                                            3

EDUC 830       Consultation and Intervention                                                                3

EDUC 813       Child Psychopathology                                                             3

EDUC 651       School-based Family Issues and Interventions                           3

                                               

THIRD YEAR:

 

EDUC 688       Internship in School Psychology                                                            6

 

TOTAL CREDITS FOR EDUCATION SPECIALIST DEGREE           30         

 

 

AUTHORIZED DEGREE TITLES

Please check the appropriate degree:

 

(   )          Bachelor of Applied Science

(   )          Bachelor of Arts

(   )          Bachelor of Arts in Educational Studies

(   )          Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Studies

(   )          Bachelor of Chemical Engineering

(   )          Bachelor of Civil Engineering

(   )          Bachelor of Computer Engineering

(   )          Bachelor of Electrical Engineering

(   )          Bachelor of Environmental Engineering

(   )          Bachelor of Fine Arts

(   )          Bachelor of Liberal Studies

(   )          Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering

(   )          Bachelor of Music

(   )          Bachelor of Science

(   )          Bachelor of Science in Accounting

(   )          Bachelor of Science in Agriculture

(   )          Bachelor of Science in Business Administration

(   )          Bachelor of Science in Education

(   )          Bachelor of Science in Nursing

(   )          Master  of Applied Sciences

(XXX)     Master of Arts

(   )          Master of Arts in Liberal Studies

(   )          Master of Business Administration

(   )          Master of Chemical Engineering

(   )          Master of Civil Engineering

(   )          Master of Education

(   )          Master of Electrical Engineering

(   )          Master of Environmental and Energy Policy

(   )          Master of Fine Arts

(   )          Master of Instruction

(   )          Master of Marine Policy

(   )          Master of Materials Science and Engineering

(   )          Master of Mechanical Engineering

(   )          Master of Music

(   )          Master of Physical Therapy

(   )          Master of Public Administration

(   )          Master of Science

(   )          Master of Science  in Nursing

(   )          Doctor of Education

(   )          Doctor of Philosophy

(XXX)     Education Specialist

 

                                                                                                                                                 

This document will be retained permanently in the Faculty Senate Office.

 

Revised 04/23/01


 

University of Delaware
School of Education
   Master of Arts (M.A.) and

Educational Specialist (Ed.S.) in

School Psychology

Program Policy Statement



Part I.  Program History

A. Purpose Statement
B. Origin of the Program
C. Administration and Faculty

D. Degrees Offered

 

Part II.  Admission

A. University Policy on Admission
B. University Admission Procedures
C. Specific Requirements for Admission into the School Psychology Program
D. Admission Status

Part III. Degree Requirements

A. Course Requirements of the Specialist Program

B. Additional, Non-course Requirements of the Specialist Program

C. Practica and Internships

D. Portfolio Requirements of Internship

 

Part IV. General Information Relevant to the M.A. and Ed.S. in School Psychology

A. Financial Assistance
B. Application for Advanced Degree

C. Housing
D. Graduate Grade Point Average
E. Time Limits for the Completion of Degree Requirements
F. Extension of the Time Limit
G. Transfer of Credit Earned as a Continuing Education Student at the University of Delaware
H. Transfer of Credit from Another Institution
I. Transfer of Credit from the Undergraduate Division at the University of Delaware

 

 

Effective: Spring 2008


 

Part I. Program History

 

A. Purpose Statement

The school psychology "program" at the University of Delaware actually consists of two separate, yet closely interrelated degrees:  the Masters of Arts degree (M.A.) in school psychology, completed by students after their first 30 credits of coursework and an Educational Specialist degree (Ed.S.) in school psychology, completed by students after their second 30 credits of coursework in the program. The program is designed to be a three year program with students completing the M.A. after the first year and the Ed.S. at the end of the third year.  The third year of the program includes a full-time, year-long internship.

 

The program is grounded in the scientist/practitioner model in psychology, and committed to the School of Education's emphasis on the roles of Scholar, Problem Solver, and Partner.  Students are provided with a strong foundation in psychological theory and research and are trained to use a collaborative, data-based problem solving approach when applying this foundation to help solve social, emotional, and academic problems faced by children, schools, and families.  In addition to gaining theoretical and empirical knowledge, students acquire competencies in multiple skill areas, a problem solving mindset, and sensitivity and respect for cultural and individual diversity.  Consistent with the scientist/practitioner model and the role of Scholar, students are also expected to contribute to the knowledge base in psychology and education -- an expectation that is most clear in the doctoral program.  The program's philosophy is reflected in the following goals:

 

1. Students will adhere to the highest standards of ethical and professional conduct and will demonstrate respect for the dignity, worth, and individual differences of children of all cultures and backgrounds.

 

2. Students will use multiple methods of gathering reliable and valid data in the design and implementation of a variety of empirically-supported interventions for addressing problems faced by children, schools, and families.

 

3. Students will acquire an in-depth understanding of modern theories and research in the cognitive, physical, social, and emotional development of children, including knowledge of family and school systems, and will apply such knowledge to the practice of school psychology.

 

4. Students will develop a strong knowledge base specific to the profession of school psychology including its history and foundations, the various roles and functions of school psychologists, and alternative models by which services are delivered.

 

5. Students will acquire and apply specific competencies in school psychology, especially in the areas of assessment, consultation, prevention, and direct interventions, while using an ecological, problem-solving approach in the delivery of psychological services in the schools.

 

6. Students will acquire the knowledge and skills necessary to design and implement comprehensive mental health services, especially school-based services for promoting mental health and preventing social, emotional, and academic problems.

 

7. Students will work collaboratively and effectively with teachers, administrators, support staff, community agencies, children and their families, and others in the delivery of psychological services in the schools.

 

8. Students will apply a data-based, scientific problem solving approach to the delivery of all services, including assessment and intervention.  Such services will be guided by current research and an appropriate assessment and analysis of multiple individual and ecological factors that influence learning and development.  Evaluation data will be collected to demonstrate that services lead to positive outcomes. Where appropriate, students will use technology effectively in the delivery of assessment and intervention services, including in the acquisition and communication of information.

 

9. Students will develop sufficient knowledge and skills in research, statistics, and evaluation and apply such knowledge and skills in the design and evaluation of programs and services in the schools.  Technology will be used effectively in research, statistics, and evaluation.

 

 

B. Origin of the Program

The specialist-level program was first established in 1981, with the first class consisting of two students admitted in the fall of 1982.  From 1981 to 1983, the program had two part-time faculty members in school psychology.  At that time it was envisioned that the program would train school psychologists for the state of Delaware, and would eventually become nationally accredited.  The program obtained permanent status from the University in 1984 and gained national approval from the National Association of School Psychologists in 1994.  Currently, there are three faculty members assigned primarily to the school psychology program and an enrollment of 23 full-time students.

 

 

C. Administration and Faculty

The Committee on Graduate Studies in Education is the SOE-level committee that administers all the graduate programs, including the School Psychology Program.  The committee is composed of five faculty members from the SOE, a graduate student member selected by the Education Graduate Association, and the Assistant Director of the SOE, who also serves as the SOE Graduate Coordinator.

The SOE is committed to the recruitment, support, and retention of full-time, tenure-line faculty members in the area of special education.  Faculty members who teach graduate courses and advise graduate students in the SOE must have a doctorate or equivalent.  In some instances, persons with a master’s degree and special expertise in a relevant area of Education as a result of concentrated study, employment experience, or service may be recommended for graduate teaching.  In such cases, the faculty member must have a record of successful teaching in the relevant area of Education, proven scholarly ability, and the endorsement of the School Psychology faculty and the SOE Director.

School Psychology faculty members review candidates for admission to the program in School Psychology, serve as advisors to candidates admitted to the program, teach courses in the program, and evaluate candidates’ exhibits, practica, internships, and other performance products.

D. Degrees Offered

The degrees awarded to candidates who complete this program are an Master of Arts (M.A.) in School Psychology followed by an Educational Specialist (Ed.S.) in School Psychology.

 

Part II. Admission

A. University Policy on Admission

Admission to the graduate program is competitive. Those who meet stated minimum requirements are not guaranteed admission, nor are those who fail to meet all of those requirements necessarily precluded from admission if they offer other appropriate strengths.

B. University Admission Procedures

Applicants must submit all of the following items to the Office of Graduate Studies before admission is considered:

Completed applications are due by February 1 for admission in the subsequent Fall semester. Admission application forms are available from the Office of Graduate Studies, from the departments, and online (http://www.udel.edu/admissions/appinfo.html).

A $60 nonrefundable application fee must be submitted with the application. Checks must be made payable to the University of Delaware. Applications received without the application fee will not be processed. Foreign students may utilize either a check or an International Postal Money Order to remit payment in U.S. currency.

An official transcript of all previous college records must be sent directly from the institution to the Office of Graduate Studies. Students who have attended the University of Delaware need not supply a transcript from Delaware. Transcripts issued in a language other than English must be accompanied by an official translation into English. If the rank of the student is not displayed on the transcript or diploma, an official letter of explanation and ranking from the institution where the degree was earned is required.

Applicants must submit at least three letters of recommendation. The School Psychology faculty recommend that these letters be written by teaching supervisors and professors who know the applicant well. 

If English is not their first language, international student applicants must demonstrate a satisfactory level of proficiency in the English language on the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL). The TOEFL is offered by the Educational Testing Service in test centers throughout the world. TOEFL scores that are more than two years old are not acceptable. In order for a student visa to be issued, international students first must be offered admission to the University and provide evidence of adequate financial resources. The University has been authorized under federal law to enroll non-immigrant alien students. International students are required to purchase the University-sponsored insurance plan or its equivalent.

It is a Delaware State Board of Health Regulation and a University of Delaware mandate that all entering graduate students born after January 1, 1957 give proof of proper immunization for measles, mumps, and rubella. If immunization requirements are not met, the student will not be eligible to register. Specific information may be obtained from the Student Health Service at 302-831-2226.

C. Specific Requirements for Admission into the School Psychology Program

 

                The School Psychology Program seeks candidates for admission with qualities that will enable them to become outstanding school psychologists.  School psychologists must have the skills to analyze educational problems at all levels of the system; design, implement, and evaluate interventions to prevent or solve these problems; and collaborate with families, educators, and community members to promote healthy educational and psychological outcomes for all children.  Therefore, we seek candidates who demonstrate the following dispositions:

Applicants are judged individually. However, the following are required and guide the admission process:

     Courses designed to remediate deficiencies in an applicant's background may be required. Credit for these courses would not apply to the program's required credit hours.

     The School of Education will accept as many as 9 graduate credits toward the Master's degree. Applicants should inquire about possible transfer credits early in the admissions process because certain courses may not be taken elsewhere.

 

Review of applications

D. Admission Status

Students admitted into any of the School Psychology degree programs are only admitted on a full-time basis with regular (non-provisional) status. Regular status is offered to students who meet all of the established entrance requirements and who have the ability, interest, and commitment necessary for successful study at the graduate level in a degree program.

 

Part III. Degree Requirements

 

A. Course Requirements for the M.A. and Ed.S. degrees in School Psychology

 

The Specialist program requires three years of full-time study.  With special permission from the student's advisor and program coordinator, the equivalent of one year of coursework may be completed part-time.  Upon completion of the first year of coursework (30 credits) and passing of a comprehensive exam, students are awarded a Master’s of Arts in School Psychology.  All students are expected to continue their studies to earn the Educational Specialist degree in School Psychology, which requires 30 additional credits including a 1,200-hour internship.  It is only upon completion of the full 60-hour integrated program that a student is eligible for certification as a school psychologist in Delaware as well as most other states.

 

Specialist Curriculum

 

First Year (Master's Level)

 

Fall

 

EDUC 618           Special Services in the Schools

EDUC 663           Counseling Skills Laboratory

EDUC 817              Individual Intelligence Testing

EDUC 744              Educational Measurement and Progress Monitoring                   

 

 

 

 

Winter Session (or Summer)

 

EDUC 623            Applied Human Development in the Schools

EDUC 814            Psychological Assessment of Children

 

 

Spring

 

EDUC 671            Practicum in School Psychology

EDUC 679            Instructing Elementary/Middle Schoolers with Mild Disabilities

EDUC 870            Child Neuropsychology

EDUC 830            Consultation and Intervention: School Discipline

 

Comprehensive Examination

Master of Arts (M.A.) Degree conferred

 

Second Year (Specialist level)

 

Fall

 

EDUC 831            Advanced Counseling Techniques

EDUC 671            Practicum in School Psychology

EDUC 813            Childhood Psychopathology

EDUC 691            Applied Statistics and Research Design

 

Spring

 

EDUC 671            Practicum in School Psychology

EDUC 651            School-Based Family Issues and Interventions

EDUC 841              Consultation and Intervention: Mental Health                                              

EDUC 842              Assessment of Special Populations

 

 

Third Year

 

EDUC 688            Internship in School Psychology (3 credits per semester)

 

Note: Students who choose to enroll for 3 credits of internship may not be considered “full-time students” for the purpose of deferring student loans.  Students are responsible for determining their loan status.

 

Educational Specialist (Ed.S.) Degree conferred

 

 

B. Additional, Non-Course Requirements for the Specialist Program

 

Minimum GPA of 3.5

 

Students must maintain a minimum cumulative grade point average of 3.5 to be eligible for the Master's degree and Educational Specialist degree.  Students also must obtain a grade of B- or higher in each practica in order to advance to the next level of the program.   Additionally, a grade of B- or higher is required during each semester of the internship in order to complete the program and receive the Educational Specialist degree.  Note that proficiency in oral and written expression in English is among the requirements for a grade of B- in practica and the internship.

 

 

 

Comprehensive Examination

 

The comprehensive examination is usually administered to first-year students during the last week of the Spring semester.  Alternate exam times are sometimes arranged for students who wish to participate in Winter or Summer graduation.  The exam consists of several essay questions covering material from first-year courses.  Successful completion of the exam and coursework results in the Master of Arts degree.  The exam is graded by two or more members of the school psychology faculty.  Student identities are masked for the purpose of exam grading.  Students failing the exam are given the opportunity to take a second exam.  At the discretion of the faculty, this second exam may cover all or part of the first year course material and may be written and/or oral.  Students must pass the second administration in order to continue in the program.

 

Residency Requirement

All students must complete a full-time residency.  Minimally, at the Specialist level students are required to spend one, continuous year (Fall semester, Spring semester) of full-time course work in the program.  This does not include the internship.  Full time work is defined as completing nine credit hours per semester.  It is strongly recommended that both years of coursework be completed on a full-time basis.

 

 

E. Practica And Internship

Practica

Carefully constructed practica (3 courses for a total of 9 credits) are a part of every student's program. These practica are in addition to practicum experiences embedded within certain courses (i.e., assessment, counseling, consultation, and intervention courses). The first practicum orients students to the educational process and gives them the opportunity to practice diagnostic assessment skills. In the second and third practica, students refine their assessment skills and develop expertise in direct and indirect intervention (e.g., individual and group counseling, teacher and family consultation, design and implementation of behavior management programs).

Practicum assignments are made by faculty to ensure that students gain experience with a variety of ages, cultures, and disabilities. Most practica are completed in regular school settings; however, one practicum may be completed in a more "specialized" setting, such as programs for children with physical and/or sensory impairments, alternative schools, schools for children with autism or other severe disabilities. Students interested in a particular area should discuss possible placements with the University practicum supervisor. Supervision is provided on-site by a certified school psychologist; students also attend weekly group supervision meetings with a University faculty member.

Proficiency in English expression, both oral and written, is required for all practica and internship placements (as well as for graduation).

Internship

For students in the Educational Specialist degree, an internship is completed in the third year of training. The objective of the internship is to insure competency and integration of knowledge and skills in all domains of school psychology and to broaden such knowledge and skills.

The internship requires full-time participation, five days per week for one academic year. Interns must log a minimum of 1,200 clock hours for the Educational Specialist degree. Under unusual circumstances, and with permission of the program faculty, the internship may be completed over a two year period. At least one-half of the clock hours must be completed in a school setting. Internship sites follow guidelines established by the National Association of School Psychologists, and a plan of objectives and activities that are delineated and evaluated on the Field Experience Checklist and Evaluation Form.  As described in the Internship Guidelines, a written contract between the university, internship site, and intern must be formalized prior to beginning an internship. Students typically handle a case load roughly half of that required for a certified school psychologist. They must participate in a minimum of 4 hours of weekly supervision from a certified school psychologist (or someone with other appropriate credentials for placements in non-school settings) and log at least 1,200 clock hours that document a full range of experiences and services with a diverse population of students.

Finding an appropriate internship site is the joint responsibility of the university supervisor and the student. While every effort is made to arrange for a paid internship, paid internships are not guaranteed. However, over the past ten years all interns have been offered paid internships (averaging about $16,000). Students have completed their internships in Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, Virginia, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Florida, Iowa, Illinois, Texas, and Alaska.

Placements must be approved by the university supervisor. Although the supervisor attempts to place interns in locations that they most desire, the program's obligations to local school districts must be respected. As such, the University may require that an internship be completed in a local school district. Likewise, quality of the site is always considered to be more important than a high salary.

F. Portfolio Requirements Of Internship

Students are required to develop a portfolio of documents that demonstrate their competence as a reflective practitioner of school psychology.  The portfolio will be used, in part, to establish the grade for the internship. The items selected for the portfolio are examples of their very best work and should clearly demonstrate mastery of the skills involved. The primary purpose of the portfolio is not to help students improve their skills, but for them to demonstrate the skills they have developed over the past 2 years as well as during the internship. 

Professional Development Goals and Activities:  Students develop a set of two to four goals for their professional development for the year and a sequence of activities designed to address those goals. 

Report Writing:  Students submit a completed psychoeducational evaluation report that demonstrates their ability to conduct a comprehensive assessment that is linked to intervention. 

Counseling: Students submit a videotape of a counseling session with a student, along with progress notes on the session

Consultation: Students submit a videotape of a problem-solving consultation session with a teacher. 

Comprehensive Assessment/Intervention Case Study: Students submit a complete case study demonstrating that they possess the knowledge and professional expertise to collaborate with teachers, families and other professionals in designing, implementing, and evaluating interventions that effectively respond to the educational and mental health needs of children and youth. 

Special Project: This project involves an activity outside the “day-to-day” assessment/intervention work of most school psychologists.  That is, it should be concerned with an issue at the school or district level (i.e., systems level).  The content of the project is open, but it is highly recommended that the project reflect student contributions to prevention or intervention programs concerning social, emotional, or academic development.  The focus might be the student’s involvement in school policies, needs assessment, program design, program implementation, or program evaluation.

Passing score on the PRAXIS exam in school psychology.  Students are required to achieve a passing score (660) on the National School Psychology Examination administered by the Educational Testing Service.

Part IV. General Information Relevant to M.A. and Ed.S. Degree Candidates

A. Financial Assistance

Over the past five years or so, more than 75% of students in the school psychology program have received either a Teaching Assistantship (TA) or a Research Assistantship (RA). During the past 3 years, all students have received either a TA or RA. TA and RA positions require 20 hours work per week. Students with TA and RA positions receive tuition remission during the regular semesters (but not during Winter Session or Summer sessions) and receive approximately $16,000 in support per year. Although every effort is made to find assistantships for returning students, students receiving a TA or RA one year are not guaranteed support the next year.

 The majority of students in good standing typically receive financial support from either the School of Education or from various research and teaching centers associated with CEHD and the School of Education. Centers that often award assistantships to school psychology students are the Center for Disability Studies, the Center for Educational Research and Development, and the Delaware Center for Teacher Education.

a. RA Positions. Students work on faculty projects for 20 hours per week. An attempt is made to match faculty and student interests, but students should consider this opportunity to develop competencies in new areas. Assignments are made by the Director of the School of Education, subject to the approval of the faculty member(s) directing the research project.

b. TA positions. Students assist in teaching undergraduate and/or graduate courses. Students may prepare and grade examinations under the supervision of the instructor, handle routine class procedures, counsel and tutor students, and possibly conduct classes. In some cases, time is split between two or more courses, but the total workload will not exceed 20 hours per week.

For questions or concerns about assistantships and fellowships, please contact Dr. Gail Rys in the School of Education.

     Students who do not receive an assistantship often work part-time, but no more than 20 hours per week. In the past, several school psychology students without assistantships have worked on-campus as resident hall directors and in other departments, such as admissions, student services, and financial aid. Interviews for Residence Hall assistantships usually begin in early April. Interested students should contact the Office of Residence Life (831-1201).

B. Application for Advanced Degree

To initiate the process for degree conferral, candidates must submit an "Application for Advanced Degree" to the Office of Graduate Studies. The application deadlines are February 15 for Spring candidates, May 15 for Summer candidates, and September 15 for Winter candidates. The application must be signed by the candidate's adviser and by the Director or the Assistant Director of the School of Education. There is an application fee of $35 for master's degree candidates and a $95 fee for doctoral degree candidates. Payment is required when the application is submitted.

 

C. Housing

An Off-Campus Housing Service is provided by the Office of Residence Life, which is located at 5 Courtney Street (off of Academy Street; across the street from the Student Center Parking Lot exit). The service provides a list of rooms, apartments, and houses available for renting or sharing. Listings are updated on a weekly basis. Housing lists can be obtained through the mail or at the office.

On-campus graduate housing is available for married and single graduate students in the form of one- and two-bedroom apartments. For a brochure and application form contact http://www.udel.edu/hcs/housing/rental/.

D. Graduate Grade Point Average

 

Students must have a minimum overall cumulative grade point average of 3.0 to be eligible for the degree.  In addition, the grades in courses applied toward the degree program must equal at least 3.0.  All graduate-numbered courses taken with graduate student classification at the University of Delaware are applied to the cumulative index.  Credit hours and courses for which the grade is below  “C-“ do not count toward the degree even though the grade is applied to the overall index.  Candidates should check to be certain that their instructors have submitted all final grades.

 

E. Time Limits for the Completion of Degree Requirements

 

Time limits for the completion of degree requirements begin with the date of matriculation and are specifically expressed in the student’s letter of admission.  The University policy for students entering a master’s degree program is ten consecutive semesters to complete the degree requirements.  Students who change their degree plan and have transferred from one degree program to another degree program are given ten consecutive semesters from the beginning of the first year in the latest program.

 

F. Extension of the Time Limit

 

An extension of time limit may be granted for circumstances beyond the student’s control.  Requests for time extensions must be made in writing and approved by the student’s adviser and the Director or Assistant Director of the School of Education.  The Director/Assistant Director will forward the request to the Office of Graduate Studies.  The Office of Graduate Studies will determine the student’s eligibility for a time extension and will notify the student in writing of its decision to grant an extension of time.

 

G. Transfer of Credit Earned as a Continuing Education Student at the University of Delaware

Students who complete graduate credits with the classification of CEND (Continuing Education Nondegree) at the University of Delaware may use a maximum of 9 graduate credits earned with this classification toward their graduate degree. The CEND credits, grades, and quality points become a part of the student's academic record and grade point average. CEND credit can be transferred provided that: (a) the course was at the 600 or 800 level, (b) the course was taken within the time limit appropriate for the degree, (c) the course was approved by the student's adviser and the Director/Assistant Director of the School of Education, and (d) the course was in accord with the requirements for the degree.

H. Transfer of Credit from Another Institution

Graduate credit earned at another institution will be evaluated at the written request of the student. Such a request should be submitted first to his or her advisor using a Request for Transfer of Graduate Credit form. A maximum of 9 credits required for the degree will be accepted provided that such credits: (a) were earned with a grade of no less than B-, (b) are approved by the student's adviser and the Director/Assistant Director of the School of Education, (c) are in accord with the requirements of the degree, (d) are not older than five years, and (e) were completed at an accredited college or university. The credits, but not the grades or quality points, are transferable to University of Delaware graduate records. Graduate courses counted toward a degree received elsewhere may not be used. Credits earned at another institution while the student was classified as a continuing education student at that institution are not eligible to be transferred to one's graduate degree at the University of Delaware. Credits from institutions outside of the United States are generally not transferable to the University of Delaware.

 

I. Transfer of Credit from the Undergraduate Division at the University of Delaware

Students who wish to transfer credits from their undergraduate record to their graduate record may transfer a limited number by arranging with the department to have these courses approved by their instructors before the courses are taken. These courses must be at the 600-level, and the student must perform at the graduate level. They must be in excess of the total required for the baccalaureate degree, must have grades of no less than B-, and must not be older than five years. The credits, grades, and quality points will transfer.

 

 


ASSESSMENT OF LIBRARY RESOURCES

 





SELF STUDY REPORT for the

Educational Specialist in School Psychology Program

Prepared by Marika Ginsburg-Block Ph.D., Program Coordinator

Fall 2011

 

 

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROGRAM

 

INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY

 

The school psychology program at the University of Delaware was first established in 1981, with the first class consisting of two students admitted in the fall of 1982. From 1981 to 1983, the program had two part-time faculty members in school psychology. At that time it was envisioned that the program would train school psychologists for the state of Delaware, and would eventually become nationally accredited. The Specialist program (previously the certificate program and since 2005 the degree program) has been approved by the National Association of School Psychologists since 1994. Three faculty members are assigned full-time to the school psychology program. Adjunct faculty and faculty in other program areas (e.g., special education, measurement) also teach courses in the program.

The School Psychology Program is based on the Standards for School Psychology Training Programs developed by the National Association of School Psychologists (2000). The program is grounded in the scientist/practitioner model in psychology, and committed to the School of Education's emphasis on the roles of Scholar, Problem Solver, and Partner. Students are provided with a strong foundation in psychological theory and research and are trained to use a collaborative, data-based problem solving approach when applying this foundation to help solve social, emotional, and academic problems faced by children, schools, and families. In addition to gaining theoretical and empirical knowledge, students acquire competencies in multiple skill areas, a problem solving mindset, and sensitivity and respect for cultural and individual diversity. Consistent with the scientist/practitioner model and the role of Scholar, students are also expected to contribute to the knowledge base in psychology and education -- an expectation that is most clear in the doctoral program. The program's philosophy is reflected in the following goals:

1.            Students will adhere to the highest standards of ethical and professional conduct and will demonstrate respect for the dignity, worth, and individual differences of children of all cultures and backgrounds.

2.            Students will use multiple methods of gathering reliable and valid data in the design and implementation of a variety of empirically-supported interventions for addressing problems faced by children, schools, and families.

3.            Students will acquire an in-depth understanding of modern theories and research in the cognitive, physical, social, and emotional development of children, including knowledge of family and school systems, and will apply such knowledge to the practice of school psychology.

4.            Students will develop a strong knowledge base specific to the profession of school psychology including its history and foundations, the various roles and functions of school psychologists, and alternative models by which services are delivered.

5.            Students will acquire and apply specific competencies in school psychology, especially in the areas of assessment, consultation, prevention, and direct interventions, while using an ecological, problem-solving approach in the delivery of psychological services in the schools.

6.            Students will acquire the knowledge and skills necessary to design and implement comprehensive mental health services, especially school-based services for promoting mental health and preventing social, emotional, and academic problems.

7.            Students will work collaboratively and effectively with teachers, administrators, support staff, community agencies, children and their families, and others in the delivery of psychological services in the schools.

8.            Students will apply a data-based, scientific problem solving approach to the delivery of all services, including assessment and intervention.  Such services will be guided by current research and an appropriate assessment and analysis of multiple individual and ecological factors that influence learning and development. Evaluation data will be collected to demonstrate that services lead to positive outcomes. Where appropriate, students will use technology effectively in the delivery of assessment and intervention services, including on the acquisition and communication of information.

9.            Students will develop sufficient knowledge and skills in research, statistics, and evaluation and apply such knowledge and skills in the design and evaluation of programs and services in the schools.

10.        Students will develop the knowledge and skills in technology to apply in assessment, record keeping, communication, intervention, research, statistics, and evaluation, as well as other areas related to school psychological services.

11.        An additional goal for students in the Ph.D. program is that they will conduct scholarly research in which they demonstrate competence in identifying critical problems in education and psychology, reviewing and integrating existing research, designing studies and experiments that competently address such problems, collecting and analyzing data using a variety of modern statistical procedures, and formally communicating results to other researchers and practitioners.

Approved by the National Association of School Psychologists (NASP), the program balances applied skills with the related knowledge of research and theory. Unlike many other programs, students acquire approximately 1,800 hours of field experience through practicum and internship experiences in diverse settings. Although most hours are spent in culturally diverse public schools, students may work in mental health centers, hospitals, alternative programs, and various other settings committed to the mental health and education of children and families, including schools for low incidence disabilities. In each of these settings students apply and extend the knowledge and skills learned in their coursework. Further, in each setting students gain greater recognition and appreciation of individual differences. Note that our practica requirements greatly exceed those required by NASP and most other training programs -- and, our students have viewed this as a major strength of our program.

Each year, approximately 8 outstanding students are admitted to the Specialist level. Currently, approximately 24 full-time students (including interns) are enrolled. As a result, classes which are shared with Doctoral level students (no more than 2) are very small, fostering not only quality instruction but also the development of close student/student and faculty/student relationships.

UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC PRIORITIES

The Specialist Program in School Psychology intersects strategically with all 5 of the Universities Path to Prominence guiding principles. Addressing the notion of Delaware First, the program is the only program of its kind in Delaware. In recent years, although our matriculated students come to us from across the country and world, a significant and unprecedented number of Ed.S. graduates have chosen to pursue employment in Delaware (80% over the past two years as opposed to 40% in 2006). We attribute this to the strong connections we have established with local schools where our graduates are in high demand, coupled with the economic outlook in other states as far as educational hiring practices. This contributes greatly to the Delaware schools by providing them with highly qualified professionals. Reciprocally, the University benefits through increased training opportunities in the future as we place new students with our newly minted professionals for field-based experiences. Currently many of our highest demand supervisors are indeed past graduates of our program.

 

Regarding Diversity, our program brings in students from around the country and world (e.g. Turkey, China) from different racial and ethnic backgrounds. The study if school psychology is truly the study of human differences. Our students experience working in Delaware schools serving K-12 students from diverse economic, racial, sexual orientation, linguistic, and disability backgrounds.

 

Regarding Partnerships, the School Psychology Program has relationships with all of the school districts in New Castle County, as well as several in southern Delaware. Delaware districts provide field-based training opportunities for our practicum students, as well as paid internship sites for our interns during their third year of study. This fall we initiated a partnership with the Department of Education through Dr. Mike Stetter, Director of Accountability. He is going to provide an internship rotation through the DOE for two of our lucky interns.

 

The principles of Engagement and Impact fit quite well with the field of school psychology and our graduate program which addresses vexing barriers to student achievement by training highly qualified personnel to provide leadership in the provision of school-based mental health services to K-12 students. Our graduates are currently employed as school psychologists across the country. They are serving as lead psychologists in their districts and as state leaders in their professional organizations. They are engaging in much needed work in the field of education and making an impact. For example, here in Delaware graduates of our program are advising the state DOE on the development of its system for annual appraisals of school psychologists and partnering with the DOE and Autism Delaware to provide state-wide inservice opportunities.

 

 

GENERAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS

 

The Educational Specialist in School Psychology degree program is a graduate program and does not enroll undergraduates, thus fulfillment of general education requirements is not applicable here.

 

CURRICULAR REQUIREMENTS

Please note that these requirements are taken from our student handbook and written for our students, thus when the text refers to “you” we mean our students.

The Specialist program requires three years of full-time study. With special permission from the student's advisor and program coordinator, the equivalent of one year of coursework may be completed part-time. Upon completion of the first year of coursework (30 credits) and passing of a comprehensive exam, students are awarded a Master of Arts (M.A.) in School Psychology. All students are expected to continue their studies to earn the Educational Specialist Degree in School Psychology, which requires 30 additional credits including a 1,200-hour internship. It is only upon completion of the full 60-hour integrated program that a student is eligible for certification as a school psychologist in Delaware as well as most other states.

Coursework for Specialist Students

Please note that there are several changes that appear to the required coursework leading to the MA and Specialist Degrees as compared to the 2005 Faculty Senate Request Form (see pages 8-10 of this report). These changes were submitted during the fall of 2007 and approved by the Faculty Senate in Spring 2008 and are listed in the Prograsm Policy Statement.

First Year (Master's Level)

During the first year, you complete the following coursework during the Fall, Spring, and Winter or Summer session. During the session in which you take your final course, you become eligible to take the comprehensive exam. Passing this exam qualifies you to receive your Master's degree.

Fall Semester (12 credits)

§               EDUC 618: Introduction to School Psychology

§               EDUC 663: Counseling Skills Laboratory

§               EDUC 817: Individual Intelligence Testing

§               EDUC 744: Educational Measurement and Progress Monitoring

 

Winter Session (6 credits)

§               EDUC 814: Psychological Assessment of Children

§               EDUC 623: Applied Human Development

Spring Semester (12 Credits)

§               EDUC 671: Practicum in School Psychology

§               EDUC 679: Instructing Elementary/Middle Schoolers with Mild Disabilities

§               EDUC 830: Consultation and Intervention: School Discipline

§               EDUC 870: Child Neuropsychology

Second Year (Specialist level)

In the second year, students complete the following Specialist coursework, which includes the practica:

Fall Semester (12 credits)

§               EDUC 831: Advanced Counseling Techniques

§               EDUC 671: Practicum in School Psychology

§               EDUC 691: Applied Statistics and Research Design

§               EDUC 813: Child Psychopathology

Spring Semester (12 Credits)

§               EDUC 671: Practicum in School Psychology

§               EDUC 651: School-Based Family Issues and Interventions

§               EDUC 841: Consultation and Intervention: Mental Health

§               EDUC 842: Assessment of Special Populations

Third Year (Internship)

During the third and final year of the School Psychology Specialist Program, students complete the following requirements:

§               Enroll in EDUC 688: Internship in School Psychology, for 3 credits or 6 credits per semester

§               Pass the PRAXIS Exam in School Psychology

§               Complete the portfolio and have it approved

§               Complete the Application for Advanced Degree for conferral of the Specialist Degree

Note: Students who choose to enroll for 3 credits of internship may not be considered "full-time students" for the purpose of deferring student loans. Students are responsible for determining their loan status.

Minimum GPA of 3.5

Students must maintain a minimum cumulative grade point average of 3.5 to be eligible for the Master's and Specialist degree. Students also must obtain a grade of B- or higher in each practica in order advance to the next level of the program. Additionally, a grade of B- or higher is required during each semester of the internship in order to complete the program and receive the Specialist degree. Note that proficiency in oral and written expression in English is among the requirements in practica and the internship.

Comprehensive Examination

The comprehensive examination is administered to first-year students, usually during the last week of the Spring semester. Alternate exam times are sometimes arranged for students who wish to participate in Winter or Summer graduation. The exam consists of several essay questions covering material from first-year courses. Successful completion of the exam and coursework results in the Master of Arts degree. The exam is graded by two or more members of the school psychology faculty. Student identities are masked for the purpose of exam grading. Students failing the exam are given the opportunity to take a second exam. At the discretion of the faculty, this second exam may cover all or part of the first year course material and may be written and/or oral. Students must pass the second administration in order to continue in the program.

Practica

Three carefully constructed practica (3 separate courses for a total of 9 credits) are a part of every student's program. The first practicum course orients students to the educational process and focuses on assessment skills. In addition to administering and interpreting a variety of assessment tools, students implement an academic intervention with an individual child and conduct a functional behavior assessment linked to intervention. In the second and third practica, students refine their assessment skills and develop expertise in direct and indirect interventions (e.g., individual and group counseling, teacher and family consultation, design and implementation of behavior management programs, social skills training). Practicum experiences also are embedded with more content-based courses. For example, during the first semester students shadow and interview a school psychologist and administer a variety of intelligence tests.

Practicum assignments are made by faculty to ensure that students gain experience with children of a variety of ages, cultures, and disabilities. Practica require 2 full days per week and are completed in regular school settings; however, one practicum may be completed in a more "specialized" setting, such as programs for children with physical and/or sensory impairments, alternative schools, schools for children with autism or other severe disabilities. Students interested in a particular area should discuss possible placements with the University practicum supervisor. Supervision is provided on-site by a certified school psychologist; students also attend weekly group supervision meetings with a University faculty member.

Internship

For students in the specialist program, an internship is completed in the third year of training. Doctoral students complete the internship during the fifth year in the program. The objective of the internship is to insure competency and integration of knowledge and skills in all domains of school psychology and to broaden such knowledge and skills.

The internship is a culminating experience during which students not only continue to develop a full range of competencies across all domains of school psychology practice, but more importantly demonstrate the integration and application of such competencies. The internship requires full-time participation, five days per week for one academic year. Interns must log a minimum of 1,200 clock hours (1,500 for Ph.D.). Internship sites follow guidelines established by the National Association of School Psychologists, as outlined in the Internship Guidelines.

A plan of objectives and activities, which are consistent with goals of the program, are delineated and evaluated on the Field Experience Checklist and Evaluation Form. As described in the Internship Guidelines, a written contract between the University, internship site, and intern must be formalized prior to beginning an internship. This contract states the responsibilities of the training program, the internship site, and the intern. The internship is a collaboration between the training program and field site program. A written plan specifies the responsiblities of the training program and internship site in providing supervision, support, and both formative and summative performance-based evaluation of intern performance. Students typically handle a case load roughly half of that required for a certified school psychologist. They must participate in a minimum of 4 hours of weekly supervision from a certified school psychologist (or someone with other appropriate credentials for placements in non-school settings) and log at least 1,200 clock hours (1,500 for Ph.D.) that document a full range of experiences and services with a diverse population of students. During the internship, competencies in the domains of school psychology are assessed not only by field supervisors using the Field Experience Checklist Evaluation Form, but also by the University supervisors' evalution of a comprehensive portfolio that includes counseling and consultation tapes, a psychological report, a comprehensive case study (documenting positive outcomes), documentation of professional development activities, and a PowerPoint presentation (to school psychologists and students) on a system-wide intervention or evaluation project that they completed.

Finding an appropriate internship site is the joint responsibility of the university supervisor and the student. While every effort is made to arrange for a paid internship, paid internships are not guaranteed. However, over the past ten years all interns have been offered paid internships (averaging about $16,000). Students have completed their internships in Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, Virginia, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Florida, Iowa, Illinois, Texas, and Alaska.

Placements must be approved by the university supervisor. Although the supervisor attempts to place interns in locations that they most desire, the program's obligations to local school districts must be respected. As such, the University may require that an internship be completed in a local school district. Likewise, quality of the site is always considered to be more important than a high salary.

 

RESULTS OF PROGRAM QUALITY ASSESSMENTS

 

 

 

‘

Assessment data are continuously collected throughout the three-year program and used to make improvements. NASP/NCATE requires the use of 6-8 program assessments (7 & 8 are optional) to indicate program quality. The assessments we use for this purpose are the 1) Praxis II National Examination in School Psychology, 2) course grades, 3) practicum and 4) internship ratings by field supervisors, 5) a 5-item internship portfolio,6)  a comprehensive case study (which is also part of the internship portfolio), and 7) alumni surveys. A list of these assessments including a brief description and timeline for administration can be found in this report (See Other Information, page 44). Three years of cohort data for each assessment along with a brief analysis of this data may be found in this report (See Other Information sections A through H, beginning on page 47).

We also rely on the following additional assessments for program improvement:

     1. Course and Instructor Evaluations. As required by the University, students complete a course and instructor evaluation form (now on-line) at the end of each course. We take these evaluations seriously. Results are reviewed by the individual faculty member and by the Director of the School of Education, both of whom examine aggregated scores as well as written comments from students. This information is used not only to improve courses and instruction, but also is used to help determine the promotion and salaries of individual, full-time faculty members. 

     2. Candidate Evaluations of Field Supervisors and Placements. In addition to evaluating courses and course instructors, candidates are required to evaluate practica and internship placements and the respective supervisors. Evaluations are confidential and used by the university-based field supervisor and program coordinator to select and maintain quality sites. (See Program Handbook, Site Evaluation Form).

http://www.udel.edu/education/masters/psychology/handbook/appendix-c.html

     3. Exit Interviews of Interns. Near the end of the internship, interns are interviewed individually and asked how the program might be improved.

Each fall, the above information is reviewed by the school psychology faculty.  As seen in the results of the alumni surveys (See Other Information, page 97) feedback on the program has been very positive. In respect to feedback that has impacted our program, we have benefited mostly from responses to the exit interview and the survey of alumni. This is because the other assessments (i.e., the PRAXIS, course grades, field supervisor ratings, competency ratings by faculty, and internship portfolio requirements) have consistently been overwhelmingly positive, seldom providing much guidance with respect to the need for programmatic changes (with a few exceptions, as noted below).  Feedback from the alumni survey and exit interviews from these two sources has been instrumental to several recent program changes. Based on the above sources, the following actions have been made to improve the program:

 

Content Knowledge

 

1. In response to several respondents indicating a need for greater attention to Response to Intervention (RTI), Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA), and academic interventions, in 2009 we replaced the course EDUC 680 Educational Diagnosis with EDUC 744 Educational Measurement and Progress Monitoring.  We also included more on these topics in the first practicum EDUC 671, requiring additional readings and a field-based assignment (linked to the course, EDUC 679: Instructing Elementary/Middle Schoolers with Mild Disabilities, which is taken concurrently with the practicum) in which the candidate must assess a child and use on-going progress monitoring while implementing an academic intervention.

 

2. A recurrent recommendation in alumni surveys and exit interviews has been the need for a course on assessment and intervention for children with low incidence disabilities, especially children with autism. Thus, last year (spring, 2010) we implemented a newly required course, EDUC 842: Assessment of Special Populations. This new course, taught by an adjunct and graduate of our program who now works with children with low incidence disabilities, received extremely favorable reviews last spring.

 

3. In response to the 2008 alumni survey and exit interviews suggesting greater coverage of Domain 4 (Diversity), we not only added EDUC 842 (see response above) but also revised the course EDUC 651: School-Based Family Issues and Interventions, adding more on diversity (which is also covered in additional courses and field experiences). Reflecting the increased coverage of the topic of diversity, we changed the title to “Diversity and Family School Collaboration.”

 

4. In response to several respondents indicating the need for greater attention to Functional Behavior Assessment (FBA) and behavior intervention plans, in 2008 we created a second consultation course. Previously, one consultation course was required, EDUC 830, Consultation and Intervention in the Schools. This was replaced by a new version of EDUC 830, entitled Consultation and Intervention: School Discipline (a course entitled EDUC 658, School Discipline and Classroom Management, was deleted, but with much of its content incorporated into the new EDUC 830). A second consultation course, EDUC 841: Consultation and Intervention: Mental Health, was added. As part of EDUC 830, and in the context of their first practicum (EDUC 679), candidates must conduct a comprehensive FBA and link it to a recommended behavior intervention plan. The following year, and in the context of their third practicum, candidates take EDUC 841, which requires a comprehensive FBA linked to actual interventions that candidates assist a teacher in implementing (via collaborative problem solving consultation). For both projects a written report (including a formal FBA and behavior intervention plan) and consultation video are required (the second project also requires results of progress monitoring).

 

5. The above addition of a second course in consultation also addressed the recommendation of several graduates that more attention be given to systems level consultation and to crisis intervention. The new course, EDUC 841: Consultation and Intervention: Mental Health, places increased attention on these two topics. This includes the requirement that students conduct a thorough needs assessment of the school in which they are placed for their third practicum and link the results to recommended system-level changes. The needs assessment includes mental health prevention and crisis response.

 

Professional and Pedagogical Knowledge, skill, and Dispositions

 

Nearly all of the above changes address not only content knowledge but also professional and pedagogical knowledge, skill, and dispositions (we find it very difficult to separate these from content knowledge). Candidates practice and demonstrate also professional and pedagogical knowledge, skill, and dispositions in their assessment and on-going progress monitoring of academic achievement in EDUC 679 and EDUC 744 (see response #1 above). They also demonstrate professional and pedagogic al knowledge, skill, and dispositions (via required video) in EDUC 830 and 841 (see response #4 above).

 

Student Learning

 

In the projects cited above, candidates are required to demonstrate the impact of interventions on student learning. For example, in EDUC 679 candidates monitor and assess the impact of academic interventions that they implement and in EDUC 841 they assess the impact of interventions targeting behavior problems that are implemented via collaborative problem solving consultation (these are in addition to comprehensive case study required in internship).

 

External Evaluation Results

 

The extent to which our Specialist Program meets NASP/NCATE standards is evaluated  externally every 5 years when we re-submit an extensive application for renewal of our national accreditation. Most recent reviews were conducted in 2006 and 2011 and both yielded full program approval by the National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) in conjunction with NCATE.

 

NASP organizes their program review according to 4 Standards. A table indicating how our program fulfills each section of NASP’s National Standard 1 (Program Context/Structure) can be found in this report (See Other Information, page 109). Feedback from NASP/NCATE indicated that we met each of the requirements for this important standard, as well as for Standard 2 which addresses 11 core training and practice domains, including: 1) data-based decision making, 2) consultation and collaboration, 3) instruction and development of cognitive/academic skills, 4) socialization and development of life skills, 5) student diversity, 6) school and systems organization, 7) prevention, crisis intervention, and mental health, 8) home, school, and community collaboration, 9) research and program evaluation, 10) school psychology practice and development,  and 11) information technology. In addition we met all of the requirements for Standard 3 which addresses field experiences, including practica and internship. Finally, we met all of the requirements for Standard 4, Performance-based Program Assessment and Accountability.

 

Feedback obtained in August 2011 from NASP/NCATE on our assessment tools and results was overwhelmingly favorable, while some suggestions were made which our faculty will take under consideration. Those comments can be found in this report as well (See Other Information, page 108).

 

                       

STUDENT ADVISEMENT STRATEGIES           

 

Specialist students have no electives during their three-year MA/Educational Specialist Program. Therefore advisement about course selection is not required. Faculty advisors are available however to help students with their career planning or to address any faculty or student concerns that may come up. Each student is assigned to a faculty advisor upon admission to the program. Each student’s progress towards meeting the academic standards of the program is reviewed annually by the faculty as per Faculty Senate and NASP/NCATE requirements. Students in the school psychology program are required to maintain a 3.5 GPA in order to graduate. The outcome of these annual evaluations is shared with students, including meetings with individual students, as needed. In addition to graded coursework (which includes the assessment of knowledge, as well as specific performance-based skills in several courses that involve course-linked practicum experiences), students' progress is evaluated through a comprehensive exam and performance in three separate practica and an internship. Field-based school psychologists/supervisors play an active and critical role in the evaluation process. Our faculty-student ratio (also required by NASP/NCATE) is 10 students per each full-time faculty member. Given the small size of many of our seminar classes, students have easy access to all program faculty and often discuss advisement questions with our faculty interchangeably.

Student Assessment Process

At any decision point, a student may not be permitted to progress to the next level if satisfactory performance has not been demonstrated. The Field Experience Checklist and Evaluation Form which is completed by field-based supervisors, outlines procedures for evaluating progress in practicum and internship experiences.

http://www.udel.edu/education/masters/psychology/handbook/appendix-a.html

Throughout coursework and field experiences, students must adhere to the University's Code of Conduct, which is published in the Official Student Handbook. Additionally, students are expected to know the ethical standards of the National Association of School Psychologists and abide by them. Procedures for evaluating professional and ethical standards are directly linked to both the University's Code of Conduct and the ethical standards established by the National Association of School Psychologists.

As students progress through the program, their progress in assessment, counseling, and consultation is evaluated using specific rubrics which can be found on our website: http://www.udel.edu/education/masters/psychology/handbook/appendix-e.html. Note that similar evaluation tools are used throughout the program; however, students' performance is evaluated relative to their levels of training. That is, the performance considered "adequate" for each element is gradually increased over the course of the program. These rubrics are used, at a minimum, within one formal course or practicum, and the internship portfolio. Additional information about the performance-based assessments can be found in the Practicum Guidelines and Internship Guidelines on our website. Note also that the student gives feedback to the program regarding each semester's practicum placement using a Site Evaluation Form.

Interns at both the specialist and doctoral levels must satisfactorily complete internship portfolios consisting of a comprehensive psychological report, a comprehensive case study that links assessment to an effective intervention, demonstration (via tapes) of effective counseling and consultation skills, documentation of professional development activities, and a "special project" that demonstrates systems-level involvement in a prevention program, curriculum program, or program evaluation. Each portfolio item is evaluated by the university supervisor. Interns also are evaluated by their field supervisors using the Field Experience Checklist and Evaluation Form at the close of each semester of internship for the purpose of assessing skills in all domains of school psychology practice. Internship logs, submitted the first of every month, also are evaluated by the university-based supervisor and feedback on the logs is given to the intern.

Additionally, interns are required to achieve a passing score (165) on the National School Psychology Examination administered by the Educational Testing Service. The School Psychologist test, code 10400, is administered through the Praxis Series of Educational Testing Service. Information about the test and available test dates are available on the NASP web page and the Delaware Department of Education's web site.

Finally, each intern participates in an exit interview with one or more program faculty to evaluate progress, plan for ongoing professional development, and offer feedback on strengths/weaknesses of the program.

Assessment Process of Interpersonal and Professional Competencies

Because all candidates will be working and collaborating with students, families, teachers, and administrators, the program recognizes the importance of interpersonal and professional competencies, in addition to traditional academic skills. These competencies are carefully monitored by faculty and site supervisors through course work and practicum experiences and evaluations. At the conclusion of second practicum and of internship, students will be evaluated by their site supervisors according to the ‘Professional Dispositions of Effective Educators Form,’ which assesses the interpersonal and professional dispositions of students that are necessary to be effective in today’s schools. In accordance with the Professionalism Policy for Professional Education Programs at the University of Delaware, all students must review the new policy and complete the Signature of Professional Education Candidate form prior to participating in any field experience. More information can be found on the Office of Clinical Studies website at http://www.udel.edu/ocs/.

When problems are noted, one or more faculty members will meet with the student, inform him/her of the nature of the concerns, and assist the student in developing a remediation plan, if necessary. Interpersonal and professional difficulties subject to remediation plans may include (but are not limited to): accepting and utilizing feedback in supervision, developing and maintaining productive working relationships with faculty, peers, colleagues and clients, and behaving ethically and professionally (including all of the professional behaviors listed in the Field Experience Checklist) in practicum and classroom environments. In addition, personal or mental health problems that interfere with the quality of a student’s work may be subject to the provisions of this policy. Remediation plans may include (but are not limited to) additional practicum experiences, additional practicum supervision, personal therapy, and/or a leave of absence.

If the concern is not satisfactorily remediated as agreed upon by the student and faculty member(s), written notification will be mailed to the student with details of the reasons for possible dismissal from the program. The student will have two weeks to prepare a response to such notification and to ask for a formal review by the school psychology faculty. At such a review meeting, the faculty and student will both have the opportunity to present their perceptions of the situation. The faculty committee will then make a final determination regarding dismissal.

Procedures for Dismissal from the Program

If in the professional judgment of the school psychology faculty a student has failed to make satisfactory progress toward meeting the standards of the program, the faculty may vote to dismiss that student from the program. Rarely have students been dismissed. Dismissal may occur for the following reasons: (a) failure to maintain the required GPA (i.e., 3.5), (b) failure to complete practicum requirements, (c) ethical violations (e.g., plagiarism, cheating), (d) failure to pass the comprehensive exam in school psychology, and (e) serious deficiencies in interpersonal or professional competencies (as described above). When a student violates ethical standards or demonstrates deficiencies in interpersonal or professional competencies, the decision as to whether the student will be offered an opportunity to remediate deficiencies or will be immediately recommended for dismissal is solely at the discretion of the faculty.

In the case of dismissal, the program coordinator will send a report to the Office of Graduate Studies that states the faculty vote on the decision causing dismissal and the justification for this action. The Office of Graduate Studies will notify the student in writing when the student is being dismissed for failure to make satisfactory progress in the program.

Appeals

Students may appeal faculty decisions. Students should address requests for course waivers and appeals related to faculty interpretations of these guidelines to the School of Education Graduate Studies Committee. Appeals of grade and decisions to dismiss students from the program follow University procedures and are handled outside the School. For these decisions, students should follow the Academic Appeals process outlined in the University Catalog. Students should keep in mind that all the regulations and guidelines in the University Catalog apply to them over and beyond the requirements in this document.

 

PROGRAM ACCREDITATION REQUIREMENTS

 

In order to maintain full accreditation from the National Association of School Psychologists our program must conform to the NASP Standards for Graduate Preparation of School Psychologists. These can be viewed using the following link:

 

http://www.nasponline.org/standards/2010standards/1_Graduate_Preparation.pdf

 

Currently our program is aligned with the 2000 version of the standards; however, beginning January 1, 2015 our program will be required to demonstrate alignment with the 2010 revision of the Standards. The new Standards have been reorganized yet they are quite similar to the older version; therefore, our program should have no problem demonstrating this alignment. We will however consider necessary changes to the program beginning Spring 2012 such that any needed changes may be proposed during the Fall 2012 semester. This will allow us to have at least 3 years of data collection in line with the new Standards before our program is up for another national review.

                       

ADMISSION CRITERIA AND DEGREE REQUIREMENTS

 

The School Psychology Program seeks candidates for admission with qualities that will enable them to become outstanding school psychologists.  School psychologists must have the skills to analyze educational problems at all levels of the system; design, implement, and evaluate interventions to prevent or solve these problems; and collaborate with families, educators, and community members to promote healthy educational and psychological outcomes for all children.  Therefore, we seek candidates who demonstrate the following dispositions:

Applicants are judged individually. However, the following are required and guide the admission process:

Courses designed to remediate deficiencies in an applicant's background may be required. Credit for these courses would not apply to the program's required credit hours.

The School of Education will accept as many as 9 graduate credits toward the Master's degree. Applicants should inquire about possible transfer credits early in the admissions process because certain courses may not be taken elsewhere.

Students' applications are reviewed by at least two faculty members. Approximately 15 of the most promising candidates are selected for personal interviews. Candidates' grades, test scores, letters of recommendation, and personal statements are reviewed for evidence of the qualities and predispostions listed above.

The interview process consists of three components. First, students participate in a small group orientation (usually about five students are included in a group). During this process, candidates introduce themselves to each other, listen to a presentation about the program from faculty, and ask questions about the program. Second, candidates participate in a series of 15-20 minute individual interviews with at least two faculty members. Third, candidates have the opportunity to talk with one or two current students in the program. The first two portions of the interview are evaluative; candidates' statements, questions, and interactional style are observed for evidence of the qualities and predispostions listed below. The third part of the interview is confidential. This conversation allows candidates to receive candid information about the program without concern for how their questions might be perceived by faculty.    

Following the interviews, candidates are 1) offered admission, 2) placed on the waiting list, or 3) not accepted.  Each year's entering class consists of 6-10 students.  There is no provisional acceptance.     

Please note that admission to the program is competitive.  Those who meet stated requirements are not guaranteed admission, nor are those who fail to meet all of those requirements necessarily precluded from admission if they offer other appropriate strengths.

                       

RECRUITING PROCEDURES

 

During campus interviews with our prospective candidates we usually ask students how they learned about our program. Most often it is from our website or word of mouth from a faculty member at their undergraduate institution, friend or relative. As a nationally accredited program we are listed on the National Association of School Psychologists website which includes a link to our website. This has proven to be a valuable recruitment tool as students seek accredited institutions within a specific region. Prior to 2008 we had a password protected handbook online. Since the handbook contains such rich information about the program which is useful to prospective students we removed the password and have made our handbook public. Since that time (and prior) we have received numerous compliments about how informative our website is compared to other institutions. Given the national and international reputations of our faculty members word of mouth has also proven to be a tremendous source of applicants to our program. We can count on colleagues from other institutions sending us a steady stream of their qualified undergraduates.

 

Beginning last fall (2010) the School of Education began a fall open house for prospective students with breakout sessions for each graduate program. We had a sizeable number of students attend and then follow-up with submitting their applications. Our graduate program staff  (Gail Rys & Christina Johnston) also visit college fairs and court potential students for our program. Last year I believe they visited Penn State University, as well as an event geared towards recruiting from historically black colleges, among other venues.

 

STUDENT INFORMATION

                       

APPLICATION AND ENROLLMENT HISTORY

 

Approximately 60-70 students apply for admission to the MA/Ed.S. Programs in School Psychology annually, competing for 8 positions. Acceptance rates vary across years ranging from 10-15%.  Our matriculated students on average have GPA’s from their undergraduate institutions of 3.5 or above and average GRE scores of 1150-1200 (verbal and quantitative combined). Students are admitted into the M.A. program and after successful completion of their 30 credits in the M.A. program and a comprehensive exam, students are automatically matriculated into the Ed.S. Program. Below is a table containing information about the ethnic/racial status of our matriculated students as well as program completion rates. Since 2006, the first year that the Educational Specialist degree was awarded, we have graduated 45 students with more than a 95% completion rate. Overall, 20% of our graduates in the past 6 years were minorities and 87% were women.

 

Program:   Specialist

 

Academic Year Admitted/Graduated

# of Candidates Admitted to the Program

 

# of Program Completers10

 

Female

Minority

Female Non-minority

Male Minority

Male

Non-Minority

 

2009-2010/2012

1

6

0

1

8 (expected)

2008-2009/2011

0

7

0

0

7

2007-2008/2010

1

4

2

1

8

2006-2007/2009

1

8

0

0

9

2005-2006/2008

2

5

0

2

9

2004-2005/2007

1

6

0

0

7

2003-2004/2006

0

6

0

1

5

Note that these numbers include 2 Ph.D. students who also obtained the Ed.S. degree during the graduation year indicated. They may have been admitted into an earlier class since their program takes several years longer to complete.

 

                       

PLACEMENT OF GRADUATES

                       

In the past five years all of our graduates seeking employment upon graduation have been offered jobs within several months of graduation. Our 2010 graduates all had jobs by the second week in July and our recent 2011 cohort by September. While we assist students in any way that we can, such as calling upon colleagues and providing letters of reference, we do not place our graduates. We have information about the location of their jobs listed on our website.

 

http://www.udel.edu/education/masters/psychology/handbook/interns-and-grads.html

 

Our graduates are employed across the nation.  Regionally they have positions in Delaware, New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Maryland, while they have gone as far as California, Michigan, Connecticut, and Arizona.

 

We are extremely proud of our graduates, many of whom have taken leadership positions in their schools and state associations. For example, one of our 2009 graduates, Cathy Holland,  is the current President of the Delaware Association of School Psychologists.

 

FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR STUDENTS

 

Our students are highly sought after for graduate assistantships and in the past 8 years 100% of our specialists have been funded during their two years of didactic training prior to internship. This funding includes a 20 hour per week graduate assistantship for which students receive a stipend of approximately $16,000 per year along with tuition remission.  Funding is not; however, guaranteed to Educational Specialist students. Our students obtain assistantships from funded faculty and center-based research, Student Life, the Education Resource Center, Disability Support Services, etc. Our minority students have been extremely successful in obtaining competitive University Graduate Scholarship Awards through the Office of Graduate and Professional Education at the University. All students matriculated who have applied have received this award supporting them for the two years during which they took coursework at UD prior to internship. In addition, students remaining in Delaware for their internship (year 3) have been able to obtain a stipend of $16,000 to $17,000 from collaborating school districts including Christina, Appoquinimink, Colonial, Smyrna, and Caesar Rodney.

 

FACTORS FOR ATTRACTING STUDENTS

 

Annual exit interviews with our graduating interns reveal that the most attractive features of our program include our small size, collegial students, program faculty, funding opportunities, and numerous field-experiences. All of our students report being extremely prepared for their internship year and first year as school psychologists. These are the features that we emphasize during campus interviews and in our online materials. For additional information about student funding, which is seen as an important factor in matriculation decisions by our top applicants, see section on Financial Support for Students (page 41). Greater elaboration on outstanding students, faculty and an innovative curriculum is provided in the section that follows on Program Uniqueness.

 

PROGRAM UNIQUENESS

 

The University of Delaware consistently ranks among the top 25 universities in the nation, offering exceptional library and technology resources as well as an attractive learning environment. UD’s School of Education is ranked 26th for best graduate programs in education in by US News and World Report. The Specialist Program in School Psychology at the University of Delaware is the only program to offer the Specialist Degree in the state of Delaware. There is no overlap in terms of degree granting with any other professional training programs at UD. A perusal of the National Association of School Psychologists website reveals that our program is among only a handful of nationally accredited programs in the region. Within this context we believe that our program is among the top school psychology programs in the nation -- a claim based on an established history of outstanding students, faculty and an innovative curriculum.

 

As previously stated, with an acceptance rate of 10-15%, our students on average have GPA’s from their undergraduate institutions of 3.5 or above and average GRE scores of 1150-1200 (verbal and quantitative combined). Our completion rate is high with more than 95% of students completing their degrees within 3 years. As stated previously, our students are highly sought after for graduate assistantships and in the past 8 years 100% of our specialists have been funded during their two years of didactic training prior to internship. Regarding our faculty, we have published in each of the major journals in school psychology, developmental psychology, educational psychology, and special education and have assumed leadership roles in school psychology at the national and state levels. For example, during the 2010-2011 school year, Kathy Minke served as President of the National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) and Marika Ginsburg-Block served as President of the Delaware Association of School Psychologists (DASP). George Bear has served on the NASP Program Approval Board Executive Committee for many years, and he is currently an Associate Editor of the School Psychology Review, the top journal in our field, among numerous other contributions. Finally, regarding our curriculum, it is sequenced such that didactic courses are paired strategically with field-based experiences beginning in the first year of the program. Unlike many other programs, students acquire approximately 1,800 hours of field experience through practicum and internship experiences in diverse settings. Also unique to our program, the faculty has worked to cultivate positive relationships with Delaware schools such that our students are paid a stipend for their work while on internship.

 

 

 

 

INTERDISCIPLINARY RELATIONSHIPS

Through coursework, field-based training experiences, and graduate assistantships our Educational Specialist students are able to interact with students and faculty in other programs and departments. Given that our graduate students do not take electives, they are unable to take courses outside of the program area. The Educational Specialist Program does contain several courses which are sometimes taken by students in other program areas of the School of Education, Human Development and Family Studies and areas outside of the College. These courses include EDUC 691: Applied Statistics and Research Design, EDUC 813: Child Psychopathology, and EDUC 651: School-Based Family Issues and Interventions. In addition, our students often use the University of Delaware’s Early Learning Center and the College School as resources for obtaining K-12 students for practice administering assessments, as well, as for additional field-based experiences. Finally, our students are employed across campus where they work with individuals in other related fields of education, including for example, disabilities and library science.

 

PROGRAM FACILITIES

 

The School Psychology Program is house within the Willard Hall Education Building. The program office is located in 210B WHL where student mailboxes are housed along with the graduate program assistant. In addition 220WHL is often used for class because it shares a one-way mirror with 210B, which can be used for our counseling and supervision classes. Other than faculty offices (all of which are located in WHL) and classroom space there are no other facility requirements specific to the program.

 

BUDGETARY REQUIREMENTS

 

Three full-time faculty are assigned to the School Psychology Program area within the School of Education, Drs. Kathleen Minke, Dr. George Bear and Dr. Marika Ginsburg-Block. Aside from the 6 core courses taught by these faculty members, the remaining 4 Educational Specialist classes are taught by affiliated faculty and adjunct instructors, several of whom are graduates of the program. Other than faculty and instructor salaries, there are no other recurring expenses specific to the school psychology program, which actually has no budget. The School of Education has consistently budgeted funds to support several student and supervisor activities, including an annual luncheon in May for field-based supervisors who receive no honorarium for their supervision services. This budgetary allocation is at the discretion of the School of Education Director.


OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

ASSESSMENTS USED TO MEASURE PROGRAM QUALITY

 

 

Name of Assessment[1]

Type or

Form of Assessment[2]

When the Assessment Is Administered[3]

1

[Licensure assessment, or other content-based assessment (required)] [4] This must be a state or national school psychology credentialing exam. If your state does not require a school psychology credentialing exam, then the Praxis II in School Psychology must be required.

PRAXIS II – National Exam in School Psychology

Spring of internship (third) year

 

2

[Assessment of content (required)]  Program or course-embedded assessment of candidate knowledge. This might consist of a comprehensive examination, an oral or qualifying exam, an exam embedded in one or more courses that all candidates complete, and/or grades for courses in which NASP Standards 2.1-2.11 are addressed. Programs may use a combination of program or course-embedded content assessment methods.

 

Course grades

Every semester

 

3

[Assessment of candidate ability to plan (required)]  Assessment in practica that demonstrates candidates can effectively plan the professional responsibilities required of a school psychologist.

Practicum ratings by field supervisors

End of second, third, and fourth semesters

 

4

[Assessment of clinical practice (required)]  INTERN EVALUATIONS BY FIELD SUPERVISORS. Assessment that demonstrates candidates' knowledge, skills, and professional work characteristics/dispositions are applied effectively in practice during internship

 

Internship ratings by field supervisors

Twice during third year (End of fall and spring semesters)

 

5

[Assessment of candidate effect on student learning (required)]  Comprehensive, Performance-Based Assessment Of Candidate Abilities Evaluated By Faculty During Internship.

Portfolio in Internship, consisting of psychological report linking assessment to intervention, counseling tape, consultation tape, system-level “special project, and comprehensive case study

Items submitted at various points during internship, but prior to completion of internship.

6

 [Additional assessment (required)]   Assessment that demonstrates that candidates are able to integrate domains of knowledge and apply professional skills in delivering a comprehensive range of services evidenced by measurable positive impact on children, youth, families, and other consumers. NOTE: You need not have a separate assessment of this area if it is addressed by assessment 5. Simply refer to the particular assessment(s) and aggregate the relevant data (e.g., particular items or sections of an assessment)

 

Comprehensive case study (included in Assessment #5)

Spring of Internship

7

Additional assessment that addresses NASP standards (optional)]

 

Alumni Survey

Spring, every other year

 

8

Additional assessment that addresses NASP standards (optional) ]

 

 

 


 

Assessment 1 Data: Content Knowledge -- PRAXIS

 

NARRATIVE

 

Brief Description. All candidates are required to pass the Praxis School Psychologist exam in order to complete the program.

 

Alignment with Standards. The subtests of the PRAXIS can be aligned with the NASP domains, as follows. Since NASP helped develop this exam and it is used by NASP for credentialing and accrediting purposes, we see no need to be more specific with respect to possible linkages of the subtests to the domains and assume that to one extent or another all domains are covered.

 

2008 Subtests

NASP Domain

2009 & 2010 Subtests

NASP Domain

Diagnosis and Fact-Finding

2.1, 2.5

Data Based Decision Making:

2.1

Prevention and Intervention

2.7, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.8

Academic Practices

2.3, 2.6

Applied Psychological Foundations

2.4, 2.5, 2.8, 2.9, 2.10

Behavioral and Mental Health

2.4, 2.7

Applied Educational Foundations

2.3, 2.6

Consultation and Collaboration

2.2

Ethical and Legal Considerations

2.10, 2.11

Applied Psychological Foundations

2.4, 2.5, 2.8, 2.9, 2.10

 

 

Ethical and Legal Considerations

2.10 , 2.11

 

 

During the spring of 2008 the Praxis School Psychologist exam provided scores ranging from 220 to 990. National average scores were reported to be within the 660 – 750 range, representing the middle 50% of examinees with an appropriate educational level who took the test during the past three years. 

 

Beginning in 2009, scores could range from 100 to 200, with average scores in the nation reported by ETS to be 167 to 179.

 

The criterion score for passing the exam prior to 2009 was 660 for our program. Reflecting changes in PRAXIS scoring in 2009, since then the passing score has been 160. A passing score is required for program completion.

 

Brief Analysis of Data.

 

As seen below, for all three cohorts, all candidates received a passing score (note that no student took the exam twice). In 2008, the range was 700 to 790, with a mean of 767. In 2009, scores ranged from 174 to 190, with a mean of 186. In 2010, scores ranged from 171 to 189, with a mean of 181. Across the three cohorts the average percentage of items correct ranged from 74 to 92 across subtests.

 

 

Brief Interpretation as Evidence of Meeting Standards.

 

Given the results cited above, we believe the PRAXIS provides evidence that our candidates have adequate content knowledge across the domains, as listed above, measured by the PRAXIS.

 

ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTATION

 

With the exception of the information above, a description of the PRAXIS and scoring guide are not necessary since this assessment is used widely NASP. The chart summarizing candidate data is presented above, and actual scores are presented below.

 

Average PRAXIS Scores for 2008, 2009, and 2010 Cohorts

Class

% program completers who passed

PRAXIS average

For

UD

Data Based Decision Making (formerly Diagnosis & Fact Finding)

Academic Practices (formerly Applied Educational Foundations)

Behavioral and Mental Health (formerly Prevention & Intervention)

Consultation and Collaboration

Applied Psychological Foundations

Ethical and Legal Considerations

2008 (n = 10)

100

767

77

77

86

 

88

81

2009 (n= 8)

100

186

79

86

90

80

92

86

2010

(n = 8)

100

181

78

82

82

78

84

74

 

 NOTE: The names of some subtests were changed, as indicated in parentheses, and an additional subtest, Consultation and Collaboration, was added after 2008.  

*Subtest scores indicate percent correct

 


INDIVIDUAL PRAXIS SCORES

 

Individual PRAXIS Scores: Class of 2010

Class

PRAXIS score

Data Based Decision Making

Academic Practices

Behavioral and Mental Health

Consultation and Collaboration

Applied Psychological Foundations

Ethical and Legal Considerations

2010-01

184

80

87

94

93

87

64

2010-02

189

90

93

84

93

94

77

2010-03

171

69

71

63

60

81

73

2010-04

172

73

67

72

86

80

50

2010-05

179

76

100

78

71

73

79

2010-06

184

85

87

95

64

88

85

2010-07

181

79

79

84

73

88

80

2010-08

179

72

71

89

80

81

87

            *Subtest scores indicate percent correct. An overall score of 165 is required to pass.

 

Individual PRAXIS Scores: Class of 2009

Class

PRAXIS score

Data Based Decision Making

Academic Practices

Behavioral and Mental Health

Consultation and Collaboration

Applied Psychological Foundations

Ethical and Legal Considerations

2009-01

189

79

100

84

93

100

79

2009-02

190

85

79

95

87

100

86

2009-03

181

77

79

84

73

85

79

2009-04

187

77

100

100

87

77

71

2009-05

187

85

64

89

80

92

93

2009-06

184

87

79

84

60

92

79

2009-07

185

72

93

74

80

100

100

2009-08

174

67

93

79

53

77

71

 

 

 

Individual PRAXIS Scores: Class of 2008

Class

PRAXIS score

Diagnosis and Fact Finding

Applied Psychological Foundations

Applied Educational Foundations

Ethical and Legal Considerations

2008-01

790

77

93

96

76

2008-02

760

77

86

88

76

2008-03

700

77

76

71

71

2008-04

750

80

86

83

86

2008-05

790

73

97

88

86

2008-06

780

80

86

92

86

2008-07

780

77

90

83

81

 

 

Assessment 2 Data: Content Knowledge -- Grades

 

 

 

NARRATIVE

 

Brief Description

 

Knowledge in the domains of school psychology is assessed in courses and field experiences and reflected in course grades that are determined from the use of multiple methods, including: written tests and exams, written reports (e.g., literature reviews, case study and psychological reports, academic and behavioral reports, recommendations to teachers and parents, etc.), class presentations (including a simulated in-service presentation), faculty-critiqued videos of counseling, assessment, and consultation skills, and classroom discussion.

 

Alignment with Standards.

 

The chart below shows that Assessment 2 data align with content covered in the program’s required courses with each of the NASP domains. It also presents aggregated mean grades in each course, including practica and internship, for 3 separate cohorts.  Because grades below B were rare, we chose to report the mean only while indicating (with asterisk) when a grade below B was given. We see no need to report grades separately for each individual candidate since this would add no additional information.

 

All 11 domains are represented by this assessment through multiple content area course offerings and field based experiences. See Assessment 2 data for a chart listing the domains covered in each of the required courses. Courses are highlighted (i.e., with the symbol “√+”) that focus on specific domains.  See course syllabi for courses listed in this chart and a description of the assessments used to determined grades.

 

 

 

 


2.1

2.2

2.3

2.4

2.5

2.6

2.7

2.8

2.9

2.10

2.11

Course

Class of

      2009

N=8

Class of 2010

N=8

Class of 2011

N=7

ό

 

ό

 

ό

 

ό

 

ό

 

ό+

 

ό

 

ό

 

ό

 

ό+

 

ό

 

EDUC 618 Introduction to School Psychology

3.96

 

3.83

4.00

ό

 

 

 

ό+

 

ό

 

 

ό

 

 

 

ό

 

 

EDUC 663 Counseling Skills Lab

3.96

3.92

4.00

ό+

 

ό+

 

 

ό

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EDUC 817 Individual Intelligence Testing

4.00

 

4.00

3.95

ό+

ό

 

ό+

 

 

 

 

 

ό

 

 

ό

 

EDUC 744 Educational Assessment and Progress Monitoring

4.00

 

4.00

4.00

 

 

 

ό+

 

ό

 

 

ό

 

 

 

 

 

EDUC 623 Applied Human Development in the Schools

4.00

 

4.00

4.00

ό+

 

 

 

ό+

 

ό

 

 

 

 

 

 

ό

EDUC 814 Psychological Assessment in Children

3.88

 

3.92

4.00

ό

 

ό+

 

 

ό+

 

ό

 

ό

 

ό+

 

ό

 

 

ό

 

 

EDUC 830 Consultation and Intervention: School Discipline (Formerly called EDUC 658 Discipline and Classroom Management)

3.88

4.00

4.00

 

 

ό

 

ό

 

ό

 

 

ό+

 

 

 

 

 

EDUC 870 Child Neuropsychology

3.67

3.54

3.57

ό+

 

 

ό+

 

 

ό

 

 

ό

 

 

 

 

 

EDUC 679 Instructing Elementary and Middle

3.88

4.00

4.00

ό

 

 

ό+

 

ό

 

 

ό+

 

 

 

ό

 

 

EDUC 831 Advanced Counseling Techniques

3.83

3.58

4.00

ό+

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ό+

 

 

ό

 

EDUC 691 Applied Statistics and Research Design (*This course replaced EDUC 660 Educational Statistics and Measurement in 2008).

3.79

3.71*

4.00

ό

 

 

 

 

ό+

 

ό

 

 

ό+

 

ό

 

ό

 

 

 

EDUC 813 Childhood Psychopathology

4.00

4.00

4.00

ό

 

ό+

 

 

ό+

 

ό+

 

ό

 

ό+

 

ό

 

 

ό

 

 

EDUC 841 Consultation and Intervention: Mental Health (This course was first taught in 2010. It became the second part of EDUC 830 Consultation and Intervention).

 

4.00

4.00

 

ό+

 

 

ό

ό+

 

ό

 

ό

 

ό+

 

 

ό

 

 

EDUC 651 Diversity of Family School Collaboration (This course was entitled School-Based Family Issues and Interventions prior to2010)

4.00

3.63

4.00

ό+

 

ό

 

ό+

 

ό

 

ό

 

ό+

 

 

ό+

 

 

ό+

 

ό+

 

EDUC 671 Practicum I in School Psychology

3.50*

3.54*

4.00

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

EDUC 671 Practicum II in School Psychology

3.83

3.63*

4.00

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

EDUC 671 Practicum III in School Psychology

4.00

3.92

4.00

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

ό+

EDUC 668 Internship in School Psychology

4.00

4.00

 

 

 

Key:     A = 4.00; A- = 3.67; B+ = 3.33; B = 3.00; B- = 2.67; C+ = 2.33; C = 2.00; C- = 1.67

ό+ indicates domain is a primary focus of this course

ό indicates domain is included within this course, but is not its primary focus.

 

*All means reflect a grade of B or higher, with the following exceptions:

2009 Practicum 1: one B-

2010 EDUC 660: two B-

      Practicum 1: one C-

      Practicum II: one B


 

Brief Analysis of Data.

 

As reflected in mean grades shown above, which ranged from C- to A, candidates demonstrated mastery of content knowledge in multiple courses that address the NASP domains.  More specifically, a grade above C was obtained by all candidates in all courses with only one exception:  One candidate received a grade of C- in EDUC 671 (first practicum, for which remediation in report writing was necessary). Aggregated mean grades across courses ranged from 3.5 to 4.00.

           

 

Brief Interpretation as Evidence of Meeting Standards.

 

Course grades of our students in courses representing each of the NASP domains 2.1 – 2.11, as listed above, demonstrate that our students met the criteria for each domain based on their superior grades. The consistently high grades reflect that we have been able to recruit very bright and highly motivated candidates, with average GREs of approximately 1200 and undergraduate GPA about 3.6. 

 


Assessment 3:

Pedagogical and Professional Knowledge, Skills, and Disposition -- Practicum

 

NARRATIVE

 

Brief Description

 

The Field Experience Checklist: Planning and Evaluation Form for Practica and Internship (i.e., referred to herein as the Field Experience Checklist) is used to develop student goals for their 3 practicum experiences against which they are evaluated midterm and at the end of the semester by their site supervisors. Requirements on the use this instrument can be found in the online Program Handbook, Practicum Guidelines.

 

Also, note that although data are required for only two cohorts, we report it for three because when we first began writing this report we understood 3 years of data were required (which was true last year). Rather than revising sections where we report 3 years of data, we decided to keep it, thinking that this would easier for us and no hardship to reviewers.

 

Alignment with Standards

 

Evaluation items are aligned with the NASP domains in the table below, which also includes the aggregated data.

 

Brief Analysis of Data

 

Aggregated Assessment 3 data for the past three years across all items on the Field Experience Checklist are reported in the table below.  Scores are reported for each of the 3 practica, using only end-of-the semester data.

 

In addition to high mean ratings on these items (as seen in the attachments), results of ratings across all items show that 100% of candidates completed the tasks adequately (Section A items) and received either a “Satisfactory” or “Competent” rating where skills were assessed. (Thus, we see no need to report scores for individuals or a score other than the mean.)

 

Note that for items in Section “A” (items that are not skill-based), a two-point score was used, with 2 denoting that the activity was completed adequately and 1 denoting inadequate completion.  For all other sections (B-G) 1 = Unsatisfactory, 2= Satisfactory, and 3 = Competent.

 

Brief Interpretation as Evidence of Meeting Standards

 

High quality performance was seen across all domains. See responses above and alignment to domains in the table.


ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTATION

 

Program Handbook, Appendix A, pp 41-54

 

PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SCORING RUBRIC WAS RECENTLY REVISED (FALL, 2010). INSTEAD OF THE 4-POINT SCALE THAT APPEARS IN THE HANDBOOK, THE FOLLOWING 3-POINT SCALE WAS USED FOR THE DATA PRESENTED BELOW

 

0    = Not appropriate for this placement.       

1    = Unsatisfactory.  (The student needs much more practice and supervision than the majority of other students at the same level of training).         

2    = Satisfactory.  (The student demonstrates skills consistent with current level of training.  It is understood continued practice and supervision are recommended).        

3    = Competent. (The student demonstrates mastery of this skill, requiring little, or no, additional supervision).

 

 

 

 

First Practicum

Second Practicum

Third  Practicum

 

Domain 2.1: Data-Based Decision-Making

Class of 2010

N=7

(Spring 2008)

Class of 2011

N=2    (Spring 2009)

Class of 2012

N=6

(Spring 2010)

Mean

 

Class of 2009

N=8

(Fall 2007)

Class of 2010

N=8

(Fall 2008)

Class of 2011

N=9

(Fall 2009)

Mean

Class of 2008

N=8   (Spring 2007)

Class of 2009

N=8

(Spring 2008)

Class of 2010

N=8

(Spring 2009)

Mean

 

B1- Reviews student records and obtains background information on the student's developmental and educational history.  Accurately summarizes the information, including results of previous evaluations, where appropriate.

2.57

2.67

2.63

 

2.62

 

2.75

2.88

2.89

2.84

2.88

2.88

3.00

2.92

 

B2- Interviews teachers and support staff and gathers information that addresses the referral question.

2.71

2.67

2.75

2.71

2.75

2.88

2.83

2.82

2.88

2.88

3.00

2.92

 

B3- Interviews parents (personally, or by phone if necessary) and gathers information that addresses the referral question.

2.57

2.78

2.50

2.62

2.63

2.50

2.83

2.65

2.88

2.88

3.00

2.92

 

B4- Interviews the student and gathers information that addresses the referral question.

2.57

2.78

2.63

2.66

 

2.63

 

2.50

2.78

2.64

2.88

2.88

3.00

2.92

 

B5- Observes the student and the classroom environment and gathers information that addresses the referral question.  Employs methods of recording that are appropriate for the targeted behavior  (e.g., narrative, interval, frequency, duration, momentary time sampling). 

2.57

2.67

2.63

2.62

2.69

2.63

2.78

2.70

2.88

2.88

3.00

2.92

 

B6- Where appropriate, conducts functional behavioral assessments, as required in IDEA.

2.50

2.50

2.33

2.44

2.00

2.00

2.50

2.17

2.67

2.70

2.83

2.73

 

B7- Selects and uses a variety of assessment methods that address the referral question, are psychometrically sound, and provide an accurate and useful profile of the student's strengths and weaknesses. 

2.57

2.67

2.63

2.62

2.63

2.88

2.83

2.78

2.75

2.00

3.00

2.58

 

B8- Adheres to standardized directions and procedures when administering standardized tests of intellectual ability.

2.71

2.89

2.81

2.80

2.75

2.88

2.89

2.84

2.63

2.88

3.00

2.84

 

B9- Adheres to standardized directions and procedures when administering standardized tests of academic achievement. 

2.71

2.89

2.69

2.73

2.75

2.88

2.89

2.84

2.75

2.88

3.00

2.88

 

B10- Adheres to standardized directions and procedures when administering standardized measures of social and emotional functioning and adaptive behavior. 

2.71

2.89

2.69

2.76

2.75

2.88

2.89

2.84

2.75

2.88

3.00

2.88

 

B11- Conducts curriculum-based assessments in specific areas of achievement to obtain practical, authentic information that addresses the referral question.

2.57

2.78

2.79

2.71

2.63

2.80

2.81

2.75

2.75

2.88

3.00

2.88

 

B12- Scores all tests with accuracy

2.71

2.88

2.64

2.74

2.88

2.88

2.88

2.88

2.75

2.88

3.00

2.88

 

C1- Written report presents data clearly and accurately.

2.43

2.72

2.79

2.65

2.63

2.94

2.78

2.78

2.63

3.00

3.00

2.88

 

C2- Written report presents a clear, accurate, and useful interpretation of results of the assessment of intellectual ability.

2.57

2.89

2.71

2.72

2.50

2.88

2.78

2.72

2.88

3.00

3.00

2.96

 

C3- Written report presents a clear, accurate, and useful interpretation of results of the assessment of academic achievement.

2.43

2.83

2.71

2.66

2.50

2.94

2.89

2.78

2.88

3.00

3.00

2.96

 

C4- Written report presents a clear, accurate, and useful interpretation of results of the assessment of social, emotional, and adaptive functioning.   

2.43

2.33

2.71

2.49

2.56

2.69

2.78

2.68

2.75

3.00

3.00

2.92

 

C5- Written report integrates data across multiple methods and sources.

2.57

2.33

2.57

2.49

2.50

2.94

2.89

2.78

2.86

3.00

3.00

2.95

 

C6- Written report addresses a referral question.

2.57

2.88

2.71

2.72

2.63

2.88

2.89

2.80

2.88

3.00

3.00

2.96

 

C7- Written report offers a variety of practical interventions that address the referral question and assessment results.

2.57

2.83

2.57

2.66

2.56

2.88

2.89

2.78

2.88

3.00

3.00

2.96

 

C8- Completes report in a timely manner.

2.29

2.67

2.57

2.51

2.75

2.80

3.00