PERMANENT STATUS PROGRAM REVIEW
(PSPR)
Ed.S. in School Psychology
Prepared by Marika Ginsburg-Block Ph.D., Program Coordinator
Fall 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.
PERMANENT STATUS REQUEST
FORM
3
II.
FACULTY SENATE
RESOLUTION
..6
III.
ORIGINAL PROGRAM
PROPOSAL
.7
IV.
GRADUATE PROGRAM POLICY
DOCUMENT.
..11
V.
ASSESSMENT OF LIBRARY
RESOURCES
..23
VI.
SELF STUDY REPORT
1.
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE
PROGRAM
27
A.
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY
.27
B.
UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC PRIORITIES
...29
C.
GENERAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS
.30
D.
CURRICULAR REQUIREMENTS
..30
E.
RESULTS OF PROGRAM QUALITY ASSESSMENTS
34
F.
STUDENT ADVISEMENT STRATEGIES
.37
G.
PROGRAM ACCREDITATION REQUIREMENTS
..
40
H.
ADMISSION CRITERIA AND DEGREE REQUIREMENT
..40
I.
RECRUITING PROCEDURES
42
2.
STUDENT INFORMATION
A.
APPLICATION AND ENROLLMENT HISTORY
.43
B.
PLACEMENT OF GRADUATES
44
C.
FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR STUDENTS
.44
3.
FACTORS FOR ATTRACTING
STUDENTS
.45
4.
PROGRAM UNIQUENESS
.45
5.
INTERDISCIPLINARY
RELATIONSHIPS
46
6.
PROGRAM FACILITIES
.46
7.
BUDGETARY REQUIREMENTS
...46
8. OTHER INFORMATION
A. Assessments Used to Measure Program Quality ...47
B. Assessment 1: Praxis II Scores ..50
C. Assessment 2: Course Grades 55
D. Assessment 3: Practicum Ratings ..59
E. Assessment 4: Internship ratings ...72
F. Assessment 5: Internship Portfolio 87
G. Assessment 6: Comprehensive Case Study ...97
H. Assessment 7: Alumni Survey .100
I. NASP/NCATE Feedback on Program Assessment Tools ...111
J. Program response to NASP Standard 1 ...112
VII.
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: ORIGINAL APPLICATION FOR PROVISIONAL
APPROVAL
....122
APPENDIX B: TRANSCRIPT OF OPEN HEARINGS
....126
APPENDIX C: FACULTY SENATE CONCERNS
.
.127
APPENDIX D: LETTERS OF SUPPORT
..128
APPENDIX E: PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT
...130
APPENDIX F: NEW LETTERS OF APPROVAL
.131
PERMANENT STATUS REQUEST
FORM
UNIVERSITY FACULTY SENATE
FORMS
Academic Program
Approval
This form is a routing document for
the approval of new and revised academic programs. Proposing department should
complete this form. For more
information, call the Faculty Senate Office at 831-2921.
Submitted by: Marika Ginsburg-Block
phone number: 302-831-6631
Department: School of Education email address: marika@udel.edu_
Date: October 7, 2011
Action: Request for
Permanent Status for Ed.S. Degree in School Psychoogy
(Example: add major/minor/concentration, delete
major/minor/concentration, revise
major/minor/concentration, academic
unit name change, request for permanent status, policy change,
etc.)
Effective term:
12S
(use format
04F, 05W)
Current degree: Ed.S.
(Example: BA, BACH, BACJ, HBA, EDD, MA, MBA,
etc.)
Proposed change leads to the degree of:
Ed.S.
(Example: BA, BACH, BACJ, HBA, EDD, MA, MBA,
etc.)
Proposed name: Educational Specialist in
School Psychology
Proposed
new name for revised or new major / minor / concentration / academic
unit
(if applicable)
Revising or Deleting:
Undergraduate major /
Concentration:______________________________________
(Example: Applied Music Instrumental degree BMAS)
Undergraduate
minor:____________________________________________________
(Example: African Studies, Business Administration, English, Leadership, etc.)
Graduate Program Policy statement change:
No change requested
(Must attach your Graduate Program Policy
Statement)
Graduate Program of Study: Ed.S. School Psychology
(Example: Animal Science: MS Animal Science: PHD Economics: MA Economics:
PHD)
Graduate minor /
concentration:
Note: all graduate studies proposals must
include an electronic copy of the Graduate Program Policy Document, highlighting
the changes made to the original policy document.
List new courses required for the new or
revised curriculum. How do they support the overall program objectives of the
major/minor/concentrations)?
(Be aware that approval of the curriculum
is dependent upon these courses successfully passing through the Course
Challenge list. If there are no new courses enter None)
None
Explain, when appropriate, how this
new/revised curriculum supports the 10 goals of undergraduate education: http://www.ugs.udel.edu/gened/
N/A
Identify other units affected by the
proposed changes:
(Attach permission from the affected
units. If no other unit is
affected, enter None)
None
Describe the rationale for the proposed
program change(s):
(Explain your reasons for creating,
revising, or deleting the curriculum or program.)
The Educational Specialist degree in
school psychology was approved by the Faculty Senate in April 2005 to replace a
certificate program in school psychology which was previously offered. The
rationale for offering the Educational Specialist degree, based on our 2005
application was: Students receive a Masters of Arts in School Psychology after
the first year (30 credits) and a Specialist Certificate in School Psychology at
the end of the third year (which includes a full year internship). Note that national accreditation
requires a minimum of 60 credit hours.
When recently (referring to the review conducted prior to 2005)
accredited by NCATE and the National Association of School Psychologists, the
accreditation agency recommended that students receive a degree, and not a
certificate, upon completion of the 60 hour program. Note that many other universities offer
a Specialist Degree in Education.
Also note that a 30-hour Masters degree, by itself, would be
inappropriate, and cost graduates a sizable amount of pay (i.e., salaries are
often tied to a Masters regardless of the number of hours, but many school
districts recognize the Specialist degree and pay accordingly). A Specialist Degree also would recognize
that the graduates have completed far more than what is typically expected in a
Masters program.
Beginning with the graduating class
of 2006, 45 students have graduated with their 30-credit Educational Specialist
degrees from the University of Delaware after having obtained their 30-credit
M.A. This degree is the trend followed by other top programs in school
psychology. The Educational Specialist Program underwent extensive review by the
NCATE and the National Association of School Psychologists receiving full
program approval for the maximum allowable period of 5 years in 2006 and again
in 2011. Thus, it is requested that the Senate consider granting permanent
program status for the Educational Specialist Degree in School Psychology.
Program Requirements:
(Show the new or revised curriculum as
it should appear in the Course Catalog.
If this is a revision, be sure to indicate the changes being made to the
current curriculum and include a
side-by-side comparison of the credit distribution before and after the
proposed change.)
N/A
ROUTING AND AUTHORIZATION:
(Please do not remove supporting documentation.)
Department
Chairperson
Date
Dean of
College
Date
Chairperson,
College Curriculum
Committee___________________________________Date_____________________
Chairperson,
Senate Com. on UG or GR Studies
Date
Chairperson,
Senate Coordinating Com.
Date
Secretary,
Faculty Senate
Date
Date of
Senate Resolution
Date to be Effective
Registrar
Program Code
Date
Vice
Provost for Academic Affairs & International Programs
Date
Provost
Date
Board of
Trustee Notification
Date
Revised
02/09/2009
/khs
FACULTY
SENATE RESOLUTION DRAFT
WHEREAS, the Educational Specialist Program in School Psychology
was provisionally approved in April 2005, and
WHEREAS, at the end of the provisional period an external review team recommended that the Educational Specialist Program in School Psychology be given permanent status, and
WHEREAS, the Educational Specialist Program in School Psychology
is one of a select few nationally accredited programs in the region,
and
WHEREAS, the high quality of matriculated students has been demonstrated by the consistent receipt of more than 60 applications per year for 8 positions in the program, and
WHEREAS, the Educational Specialist Program in School Psychology
is consistent with the Path to Prominences emphasis on becoming a premier
graduate and professional education university that serves the state of
Delaware, be it therefore
RESOLVED, that, effective immediately, the Educational
Specialist Program in School Psychology be granted permanent status.
ORIGINAL
PROGRAM PROPOSAL
ACADEMIC
PROGRAM APPROVAL
CHECKLIST
This form
is a routing document for the approval of new and revised academic
programs. Page 2 will serve as an
attachment to the Faculty Senate agenda.
Proposing department should complete form, attach as a cover page and
forward to the college dean. Documentation should include copy of curriculum as
it is to appear in the Undergraduate and Graduate Catalog. Proposals must arrive to the
Undergraduate/Graduate Committee by November in order to reach the Faculty
Senate by March 1. Proposals
received after this date cannot be implemented the following year nor included
in the catalog for that year.
1.
Proposed
change leads to the degree of
( ) Bachelor of Arts
( XX ) Master of Arts
( ) Doctor of
Philosophy
( ) Bachelor of Science
( ) Master of Science
(X ) Other: EDUCATIONAL
SPECIALIST
2. ( ) New major/curriculum Title
to be entered in record of students who select this
program
( ) New minor
Title to be
entered in record of students who select this program
( ) Change from provisional to permanent
status.
3. (x ) Revision of existing:
(x ) major
( ) minor
( )
concentration
Present
title M.A./SPECIALIST
PROGRAM IN SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY
Records
System Program Code
(XX ) Add/delete required courses/credit
hours
( ) Add concentration
Title
( ) Delete concentration
Title
4. (
) Deletion of existing/disestablish:
( ) major
( ) minor
( ) other _______________________________
Title Code______________________
5. (
) Policy
Change____________________________________________________________________________________
Title/Department
ROUTING AND
APPROVALS: (Please do not remove supporting
documentation.)
Department
Chairperson
Date
Dean of
College
Date
Chairperson,
College Curriculum
Committee___________________________________Date_____________________
Chairperson,
Senate Com. on UG or GR Studies
Date
Chairperson,
Senate Coordinating Com.
Date
Secretary,
Faculty Senate
Date
Date of
Senate Resolution
Date to be Effective
Registrar
Program Code
Date
Vice
Provost for Academic Programs & Planning
Date
Provost
Date
Board of
Trustee Notification
Date
a. Rationale for creation, revision,
or deletion:
The School of Education is
requesting two changes to the current program:
Change #1: The school psychology program is a
3-year, 60 credit hour program.
Students receive a Masters of Arts in School Psychology after the first
year (30 credits) and a Specialist Certificate in School Psychology at the end
of the third year (which includes a full year internship). Note that national accreditation
requires a minimum of 60 credit hours.
When recently accredited by NCATE and the National Association of School
Psychologists, the accreditation agency recommended that students receive a
degree, and not a certificate, upon completion of the 60 hour program. Note that many other universities offer
a Specialist Degree in Education.
Also note that a 30-hour Masters degree, by itself, would be
inappropriate, and cost graduates a sizable amount of pay (i.e., salaries are
often tied to a Masters regardless of the number of hours, but many school
districts recognize the Specialist degree and pay accordingly). A Specialist Degree also would recognize
that the graduates have completed far more than what is typically expected in a
Masters program.
Thus, it is requested that the
Senate consider granting the Educational Specialist Degree in School Psychology
for graduates who complete the second and third year of the program. The coursework in these two years
combine for a total of 30 credits.
Thus, students who complete the three-year, 60 credit hour program would
exit with a M.A. in School Psychology (conferred after the first year, 30 credit
hours), and an Ed.S. in School Psychology (conferred after the third year, an
additional 30 credit hours).
Change #2: EDUC 658: Classroom Management and
Discipline would be added as an alternative of the currently required course
EDUC 681: Techniques for Behavior Change.
This change allows for greater flexibility in scheduling and is
consistent with recent changes in the national program standards set by the
National Association of School Psychologists and NCATE. That is, a course in behavior
modification is not required and our program was encouraged during its recent
accreditation review to offer greater training in the foundations of psychology
and education (e.g., the educational psychology aspects of EDUC 658. This change also is consistent with
recommendations of students in the program, as indicated in a recent
survey.
Both courses are routinely
offered. Thus, this change will not
require additional resources.
b. Summary of program:
*FIRST YEAR: MASTERS OF ARTS
FALL CREDITS
EDUC 618 Special
Services in the Schools
3
EDUC 817 Individual
Intelligence Testing
3
EDUC 663 Counseling
Skills Lab
3
EDUC 681 Techniques of Behavior
Change OR
EDUC 658 Classroom
Management and Discipline
3
WINTER SESSION
EDUC 623 Applied
Human Development
3
EDUC 680
Educational
Diagnosis
3
SPRING
EDUC 660 Educational
Statistics and Measurement
3
EDUC 671 Practicum
in School Psychology
3
EDUC 679
Methods in
Special Education
3
EDUC 814 Psychological Assessment of Children OR
PSYC 820
Psychodiagnostics: Objective Trait and Behavioral Assessment 3
TOTAL CREDITS FOR M.A.
IN SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY
30
COMPREHENSIVE
EXAMINATION REQUIRED AT END OF FIRST YEAR
*The completion of the M.A. does not convey certification as
a school psychologist. To be
certified, students must complete the second year coursework and a supervised
internship and must then apply for certification in the state in which they wish
to practice. The Universitys Institutional Recommendation is issued at the
successful completion of the supervised internship.
SECOND and THIRD
YEARS: Education Specialist Degree
in School Psychology
FALL CREDITS
EDUC 671 Practicum in School Psychology 3
EDUC 691 Applied Statistics & Research Design 3
EDUC 831 Advanced Counseling Techniques 3
EDUC 870 Child Neuropsychology 3
SPRING
EDUC 671 Practicum in School Psychology 3
EDUC 830 Consultation and Intervention 3
EDUC 813 Child Psychopathology 3
EDUC 651 School-based Family Issues and Interventions 3
THIRD YEAR:
EDUC 688 Internship in School Psychology 6
TOTAL CREDITS FOR
EDUCATION SPECIALIST DEGREE
30
AUTHORIZED
DEGREE TITLES
Please
check the appropriate degree:
( )
Bachelor of Applied Science
( )
Bachelor of Arts
( )
Bachelor of Arts in Educational Studies
( )
Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Studies
( )
Bachelor of Chemical Engineering
( )
Bachelor of Civil Engineering
( )
Bachelor of Computer Engineering
( )
Bachelor of Electrical Engineering
( )
Bachelor of Environmental Engineering
( )
Bachelor of Fine Arts
( )
Bachelor of Liberal Studies
( )
Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering
( )
Bachelor of Music
( )
Bachelor of Science
( )
Bachelor of Science in Accounting
( )
Bachelor of Science in Agriculture
( )
Bachelor of Science in Business Administration
( )
Bachelor of Science in Education
( )
Bachelor of Science in Nursing
( )
Master of Applied Sciences
(XXX) Master of
Arts
( )
Master of Arts in Liberal Studies
( )
Master of Business Administration
( )
Master of Chemical Engineering
( )
Master of Civil Engineering
( )
Master of Education
( )
Master of Electrical Engineering
( )
Master of Environmental and Energy Policy
( )
Master of Fine Arts
( )
Master of Instruction
( )
Master of Marine Policy
( )
Master of Materials Science and Engineering
( )
Master of Mechanical Engineering
( )
Master of Music
( )
Master of Physical Therapy
( )
Master of Public Administration
( )
Master of Science
( )
Master of Science in
Nursing
( )
Doctor of Education
( )
Doctor of Philosophy
(XXX) Education
Specialist
This
document will be retained permanently in the Faculty Senate
Office.
Revised
04/23/01
University of
Delaware Educational Specialist (Ed.S.) in
School Psychology |
Program Policy Statement
Part I. Program
History
A. Purpose Statement
B. Origin of the Program
C. Administration and
Faculty
Part
II. Admission
A. University Policy on
Admission
B. University Admission
Procedures
C. Specific Requirements for Admission into the School
Psychology Program
D. Admission
Status
Part III.
Degree Requirements
A. Course Requirements of the
Specialist Program
B. Additional,
Non-course Requirements of the Specialist Program
C. Practica
and Internships
D. Portfolio
Requirements of Internship
Part IV.
General Information Relevant to the M.A. and Ed.S. in School
Psychology
A. Financial
Assistance
B. Application for Advanced
Degree
C.
Housing
D. Graduate Grade Point
Average
E. Time Limits for the Completion of Degree
Requirements
F. Extension of the Time
Limit
G. Transfer of Credit Earned as a Continuing Education
Student at the University of Delaware
H. Transfer of Credit from Another
Institution
I. Transfer of Credit from the Undergraduate Division at
the University of Delaware
Effective: Spring 2008
Part I. Program
History
A. Purpose
Statement
The school psychology
"program" at the University of Delaware actually consists of two separate, yet
closely interrelated degrees: the Masters of Arts degree (M.A.) in school
psychology, completed by students after their first 30 credits of coursework and
an Educational Specialist degree (Ed.S.) in school psychology, completed by
students after their second 30 credits of coursework in the program. The program
is designed to be a three year program with students completing the M.A. after
the first year and the Ed.S. at the end of the third year. The third year of the program includes a
full-time, year-long internship.
The program is grounded in
the scientist/practitioner model in psychology, and committed to the School of
Education's emphasis on the roles of Scholar, Problem Solver, and Partner.
Students are provided with a strong foundation in psychological theory and
research and are trained to use a collaborative, data-based problem solving
approach when applying this foundation to help solve social, emotional, and
academic problems faced by children, schools, and families. In addition to
gaining theoretical and empirical knowledge, students acquire competencies in
multiple skill areas, a problem solving mindset, and sensitivity and respect for
cultural and individual diversity. Consistent with the
scientist/practitioner model and the role of Scholar, students are also expected
to contribute to the knowledge base in psychology and education -- an
expectation that is most clear in the doctoral program. The program's
philosophy is reflected in the following goals:
1. Students will adhere to
the highest standards of ethical and professional conduct and will demonstrate
respect for the dignity, worth, and individual differences of children of all
cultures and backgrounds.
2. Students will use
multiple methods of gathering reliable and valid data in the design and
implementation of a variety of empirically-supported interventions for
addressing problems faced by children, schools, and families.
3. Students will acquire an
in-depth understanding of modern theories and research in the cognitive,
physical, social, and emotional development of children, including
knowledge of family and school systems, and will apply such knowledge to the
practice of school psychology.
4. Students will develop a
strong knowledge base specific to the profession of school psychology including
its history and foundations, the various roles and functions of school
psychologists, and alternative models by which services are delivered.
5. Students will acquire and
apply specific competencies in school psychology, especially in the areas of
assessment, consultation, prevention, and direct interventions, while using
an ecological, problem-solving approach in the delivery of psychological
services in the schools.
6. Students will acquire the
knowledge and skills necessary to design and implement comprehensive mental
health services, especially school-based services for promoting mental health
and preventing social, emotional, and academic problems.
7. Students will work
collaboratively and effectively with teachers, administrators, support staff,
community agencies, children and their families, and others in the delivery of
psychological services in the schools.
8. Students will apply a
data-based, scientific problem solving approach to the delivery of all services,
including assessment and intervention. Such services will be guided
by current research and an appropriate assessment and analysis of multiple
individual and ecological factors that influence learning and development.
Evaluation data will be collected to demonstrate that services lead to positive
outcomes. Where appropriate, students will use technology effectively in the
delivery of assessment and intervention services, including in the acquisition
and communication of information.
9. Students will develop
sufficient knowledge and skills in research, statistics, and evaluation and
apply such knowledge and skills in the design and evaluation of programs
and services in the schools.
Technology will be used effectively in research, statistics, and
evaluation.
B. Origin of the
Program
The specialist-level program
was first established in 1981, with the first class consisting of two students
admitted in the fall of 1982. From 1981 to 1983, the program had two
part-time faculty members in school psychology. At that time it was
envisioned that the program would train school psychologists for the state of
Delaware, and would eventually become nationally accredited. The program
obtained permanent status from the University in 1984 and gained national
approval from the National Association of School Psychologists in 1994.
Currently, there are three faculty members assigned primarily to the school
psychology program and an enrollment of 23 full-time students.
C. Administration and
Faculty
The Committee on
Graduate Studies in Education is the SOE-level committee that administers all
the graduate programs, including the School Psychology Program. The committee is composed of five
faculty members from the SOE, a graduate student member selected by the
Education Graduate Association, and the Assistant Director of the SOE, who also serves
as the SOE Graduate Coordinator.
The SOE is
committed to the recruitment, support, and retention of full-time, tenure-line
faculty members in the area of special education. Faculty members who teach graduate
courses and advise graduate students in the SOE must have a doctorate or
equivalent. In some instances,
persons with a masters degree and special expertise in a relevant area of
Education as a result of concentrated study, employment experience, or service
may be recommended for graduate teaching.
In such cases, the faculty member must have a record of successful
teaching in the relevant area of Education, proven scholarly ability, and the
endorsement of the School Psychology faculty and the SOE
Director.
School Psychology
faculty members review candidates for admission to the program in School
Psychology, serve as advisors to candidates admitted to the program, teach
courses in the program, and evaluate candidates exhibits, practica,
internships, and other performance products.
D. Degrees
Offered
The degrees awarded to candidates who complete this program are an Master of Arts (M.A.) in School Psychology followed by an Educational Specialist (Ed.S.) in School Psychology.
Part II.
Admission
A. University Policy on
Admission
Admission to the
graduate program is competitive. Those who meet stated minimum requirements
are not guaranteed admission, nor are those who fail to meet all of those
requirements necessarily precluded from admission if they offer other
appropriate strengths.
B. University Admission
Procedures
Applicants must
submit all of the following items to the Office of Graduate Studies before
admission is considered:
Completed
applications are due by February 1 for admission in the subsequent Fall
semester. Admission application forms are available from the Office of Graduate
Studies, from the departments, and online
(http://www.udel.edu/admissions/appinfo.html).
A $60 nonrefundable
application fee must be submitted with the application. Checks must be made
payable to the University of Delaware. Applications received without the
application fee will not be processed. Foreign students may utilize either a
check or an International Postal Money Order to remit payment in U.S. currency.
An official
transcript of all previous college records must be sent directly from the
institution to the Office of Graduate Studies. Students who have attended the
University of Delaware need not supply a transcript from Delaware. Transcripts
issued in a language other than English must be accompanied by an official
translation into English. If the rank of the student is not displayed on the
transcript or diploma, an official letter of explanation and ranking from the
institution where the degree was earned is required.
Applicants must
submit at least three letters of recommendation. The School Psychology faculty
recommend that these letters be written by teaching supervisors and professors
who know the applicant well.
If English is not
their first language, international student applicants must demonstrate a
satisfactory level of proficiency in the English language on the Test of English
as a Foreign Language (TOEFL). The TOEFL is offered by the Educational Testing
Service in test centers throughout the world. TOEFL scores that are more than
two years old are not acceptable. In order for a student visa to be issued,
international students first must be offered admission to the University and
provide evidence of adequate financial resources. The University has been
authorized under federal law to enroll non-immigrant alien students.
International students are required to purchase the University-sponsored
insurance plan or its equivalent.
It is a Delaware
State Board of Health Regulation and a University of Delaware mandate that all
entering graduate students born after January 1, 1957 give proof of proper
immunization for measles, mumps, and rubella. If immunization requirements are
not met, the student will not be eligible to register. Specific information may
be obtained from the Student Health Service at 302-831-2226.
C. Specific Requirements for
Admission into the School Psychology Program
The School Psychology Program seeks candidates for admission with
qualities that will enable them to become outstanding school psychologists. School psychologists must have the
skills to analyze educational problems at all levels of the system; design,
implement, and evaluate interventions to prevent or solve these problems; and
collaborate with families, educators, and community members to promote healthy
educational and psychological outcomes for all children. Therefore, we seek candidates who
demonstrate the following dispositions:
Applicants are judged
individually. However, the following are required and guide the admission
process:
Courses
designed to remediate deficiencies in an applicant's background may be required.
Credit for these courses would not apply to the program's required credit
hours.
The School of Education will accept
as many as 9 graduate credits toward the Master's degree. Applicants should
inquire about possible transfer credits early in the admissions process because
certain courses may not be taken elsewhere.
Review of
applications
D. Admission
Status
Students admitted into any
of the School Psychology degree programs are only admitted on a full-time basis
with regular (non-provisional) status. Regular status is offered to students who
meet all of the established entrance requirements and who have the ability,
interest, and commitment necessary for successful study at the graduate level in
a degree program.
Part III. Degree
Requirements
The
Specialist program requires three years of full-time study. With special
permission from the student's advisor and program coordinator, the equivalent of
one year of coursework may be completed part-time. Upon completion of the
first year of coursework (30 credits) and passing of a comprehensive exam,
students are awarded a Masters of Arts in School Psychology. All students
are expected to continue their studies to earn the Educational Specialist degree
in School Psychology, which requires 30 additional credits including a
1,200-hour internship. It is only upon completion of the full 60-hour
integrated program that a student is eligible for certification as a school
psychologist in Delaware as well as most other states.
First Year (Master's
Level)
EDUC
618 Special Services
in the Schools
EDUC
663 Counseling
Skills Laboratory
EDUC 817
Individual Intelligence Testing
EDUC 744
Educational Measurement and Progress Monitoring
Winter Session (or Summer)
EDUC
623 Applied
Human Development in the Schools
EDUC
814
Psychological Assessment of Children
EDUC
671 Practicum
in School Psychology
EDUC
679
Instructing Elementary/Middle Schoolers with Mild Disabilities
EDUC
870 Child
Neuropsychology
EDUC
830
Consultation and Intervention: School Discipline
Comprehensive Examination
Master of Arts (M.A.) Degree
conferred
Second Year (Specialist
level)
EDUC
831 Advanced
Counseling Techniques
EDUC
671 Practicum
in School Psychology
EDUC
813 Childhood
Psychopathology
EDUC
691 Applied
Statistics and Research Design
EDUC
671 Practicum
in School Psychology
EDUC
651
School-Based Family Issues and Interventions
EDUC 841
Consultation and Intervention: Mental Health
EDUC 842
Assessment of Special Populations
EDUC
688 Internship
in School Psychology (3 credits per semester)
Note: Students who choose to
enroll for 3 credits of internship may not be considered full-time students
for the purpose of deferring student loans. Students are responsible for determining
their loan status.
Students must maintain a
minimum cumulative grade point average of 3.5 to be eligible for the Master's
degree and Educational Specialist degree. Students also must obtain a
grade of B- or higher in each practica in order to advance to the next level of
the program. Additionally, a
grade of B- or higher is required during each semester of the internship in
order to complete the program and receive the Educational Specialist
degree. Note that proficiency in
oral and written expression in English is among the requirements for a grade of
B- in practica and the internship.
The
comprehensive examination is usually administered to first-year students during
the last week of the Spring semester. Alternate exam times are sometimes
arranged for students who wish to participate in Winter or Summer
graduation. The exam consists of several essay questions covering material
from first-year courses. Successful completion of the exam and coursework
results in the Master of Arts degree. The exam is graded by two or more
members of the school psychology faculty. Student identities are masked
for the purpose of exam grading.
Students failing the exam are given the opportunity to take a second
exam. At the discretion of the faculty, this second exam may cover all or
part of the first year course material and may be written and/or oral.
Students must pass the second administration in order to continue in the
program.
Residency
Requirement
All
students must complete a full-time residency. Minimally, at the Specialist level
students are required to spend one, continuous year (Fall semester, Spring
semester) of full-time course work in the program. This does not include the
internship. Full time work is
defined as completing nine credit hours per semester. It is strongly recommended that both
years of coursework be completed on a full-time basis.
Practica
Carefully
constructed practica (3 courses for a total of 9 credits) are a part of every
student's program. These practica are in addition to practicum experiences
embedded within certain courses (i.e., assessment, counseling, consultation, and
intervention courses). The first practicum orients students to the educational
process and gives them the opportunity to practice diagnostic assessment skills.
In the second and third practica, students refine their assessment skills and
develop expertise in direct and indirect intervention (e.g., individual and
group counseling, teacher and family consultation, design and implementation of
behavior management programs).
Practicum assignments are
made by faculty to ensure that students gain experience with a variety of ages,
cultures, and disabilities. Most practica are completed in regular school
settings; however, one practicum may be completed in a more "specialized"
setting, such as programs for children with physical and/or sensory impairments,
alternative schools, schools for children with autism or other severe
disabilities. Students interested in a particular area should discuss possible
placements with the University practicum supervisor. Supervision is provided
on-site by a certified school psychologist; students also attend weekly group
supervision meetings with a University faculty member.
Proficiency in English
expression, both oral and written, is required for all practica and internship
placements (as well as for graduation).
Internship
For students in the
Educational Specialist degree, an internship is completed in the third year of
training. The objective of the internship is to insure competency and
integration of knowledge and skills in all domains of school psychology and to
broaden such knowledge and skills.
The internship
requires full-time participation, five days per week for one academic
year. Interns must log a minimum of 1,200 clock hours for the
Educational Specialist degree. Under unusual circumstances, and with permission
of the program faculty, the internship may be completed over a two year
period. At least one-half of the clock hours must be completed in a school
setting. Internship sites follow guidelines established by the National
Association of School Psychologists, and a plan of objectives and activities
that are delineated and evaluated on the Field Experience Checklist and
Evaluation Form. As described in the Internship Guidelines, a
written contract between the university, internship site, and intern must be
formalized prior to beginning an internship. Students typically handle a case
load roughly half of that required for a certified school psychologist. They
must participate in a minimum of 4 hours of weekly supervision from a certified
school psychologist (or someone with other appropriate credentials for
placements in non-school settings) and log at least 1,200 clock hours that
document a full range of experiences and services with a diverse population of
students.
Finding an
appropriate internship site is the joint responsibility of the university
supervisor and the student. While every effort is made to arrange for a paid
internship, paid internships are not guaranteed. However, over the past ten
years all interns have been offered paid internships (averaging about $16,000).
Students have completed their internships in Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey,
Virginia, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Florida, Iowa, Illinois, Texas, and
Alaska.
Placements must be
approved by the university supervisor. Although the supervisor attempts to place
interns in locations that they most desire, the program's obligations to local
school districts must be respected. As such, the University may require that an
internship be completed in a local school district. Likewise, quality of
the site is always considered to be more important than a high salary.
F. Portfolio Requirements Of
Internship
Students are
required to develop a portfolio of documents that demonstrate their competence
as a reflective practitioner of school psychology. The portfolio will be used, in part, to
establish the grade for the internship. The items selected for the portfolio are
examples of their very best work and should clearly demonstrate mastery of the
skills involved. The primary purpose of the portfolio is not to help students
improve their skills, but for them to demonstrate the skills they have developed
over the past 2 years as well as during the internship.
Professional Development
Goals and Activities: Students develop a set of two to four
goals for their professional development for the year and a sequence of
activities designed to address those goals.
Report
Writing: Students submit a completed
psychoeducational evaluation report that demonstrates their ability to conduct a
comprehensive assessment that is linked to intervention.
Counseling: Students submit a videotape
of a counseling session with a student, along with progress notes on the
session
Consultation: Students submit a
videotape of a problem-solving consultation session with a teacher.
Comprehensive
Assessment/Intervention Case Study: Students submit a complete
case study demonstrating that they possess the knowledge and professional
expertise to collaborate with teachers, families and other professionals in
designing, implementing, and evaluating interventions that effectively respond
to the educational and mental health needs of children and youth.
Special Project:
This
project involves an activity outside the day-to-day assessment/intervention
work of most school psychologists.
That is, it should be concerned with an issue at the school or district
level (i.e., systems level). The
content of the project is open, but it is highly recommended that the project
reflect student contributions to prevention or intervention programs concerning
social, emotional, or academic development. The focus might be the students
involvement in school policies, needs assessment, program design, program
implementation, or program evaluation.
Passing
score on the PRAXIS exam in school psychology. Students are required to achieve a
passing score (660) on the National School Psychology Examination administered
by the Educational Testing Service.
Part IV. General Information
Relevant to M.A. and Ed.S. Degree Candidates
A. Financial
Assistance
Over the past five years or
so, more than 75% of students in the school psychology program have received
either a Teaching Assistantship (TA) or a Research Assistantship (RA). During
the past 3 years, all students have received either a TA or RA. TA and RA
positions require 20 hours work per week. Students with TA and RA positions
receive tuition remission during the regular semesters (but not during
Winter Session or Summer sessions) and receive approximately $16,000 in support
per year. Although every effort is made to find assistantships for returning
students, students receiving a TA or RA one year are not guaranteed support the
next year.
The majority
of students in good standing typically receive financial support from either the
School of Education or from various research and teaching centers associated
with CEHD and the School of Education. Centers that often award assistantships
to school psychology students are the Center
for Disability Studies, the Center for
Educational Research and Development, and the Delaware Center for Teacher Education.
a. RA Positions.
Students work on faculty projects for 20 hours per week. An attempt is made to
match faculty and student interests, but students should consider this
opportunity to develop competencies in new areas. Assignments are made by the
Director of the School of Education, subject to the approval of the faculty
member(s) directing the research project.
b. TA positions.
Students assist in teaching undergraduate and/or graduate courses. Students may
prepare and grade examinations under the supervision of the instructor, handle
routine class procedures, counsel and tutor students, and possibly conduct
classes. In some cases, time is split between two or more courses, but the total
workload will not exceed 20 hours per week.
For questions or concerns
about assistantships and fellowships, please contact Dr. Gail Rys in the School of
Education.
Students who do not receive an
assistantship often work part-time, but no more than 20 hours per week. In the
past, several school psychology students without assistantships have worked
on-campus as resident hall directors and in other departments, such as
admissions, student services, and financial aid. Interviews for Residence Hall
assistantships usually begin in early April. Interested students should contact
the Office of Residence Life (831-1201).
B. Application for Advanced
Degree
To
initiate the process for degree conferral, candidates must submit an
"Application for Advanced Degree" to the Office of Graduate Studies. The
application deadlines are February 15 for Spring candidates, May 15 for Summer
candidates, and September 15 for Winter candidates. The application must be
signed by the candidate's adviser and by the Director or the Assistant Director
of the School of Education. There is an application fee of $35 for master's
degree candidates and a $95 fee for doctoral degree candidates. Payment is
required when the application is submitted.
An Off-Campus Housing Service is provided by the Office of Residence Life, which is located at 5 Courtney Street (off of Academy Street; across the street from the Student Center Parking Lot exit). The service provides a list of rooms, apartments, and houses available for renting or sharing. Listings are updated on a weekly basis. Housing lists can be obtained through the mail or at the office.
On-campus graduate
housing is available for married and single graduate students in the form of
one- and two-bedroom apartments. For a brochure and application form contact http://www.udel.edu/hcs/housing/rental/.
D.
Graduate Grade Point Average
Students
must have a minimum overall cumulative grade point average of 3.0 to be eligible
for the degree. In addition, the
grades in courses applied toward the degree program must equal at least
3.0. All graduate-numbered courses
taken with graduate student classification at the University of Delaware are
applied to the cumulative index.
Credit hours and courses for which the grade is below C- do not count toward the degree even
though the grade is applied to the overall index. Candidates should check to be certain
that their instructors have submitted all final grades.
E.
Time Limits for the Completion of Degree Requirements
Time
limits for the completion of degree requirements begin with the date of
matriculation and are specifically expressed in the students letter of
admission. The University policy
for students entering a masters degree program is ten consecutive semesters to
complete the degree requirements.
Students who change their degree plan and have transferred from one
degree program to another degree program are given ten consecutive semesters
from the beginning of the first year in the latest
program.
F.
Extension of the Time Limit
An
extension of time limit may be granted for circumstances beyond the students
control. Requests for time
extensions must be made in writing and approved by the students adviser and the
Director or Assistant Director of the School of Education. The Director/Assistant Director will
forward the request to the Office of Graduate Studies. The Office of Graduate Studies will
determine the students eligibility for a time extension and will notify the
student in writing of its decision to grant an extension of
time.
G.
Transfer of Credit Earned as a Continuing Education Student at the University of
Delaware
Students who
complete graduate credits with the classification of CEND (Continuing Education
Nondegree) at the University of Delaware may use a maximum of 9 graduate credits
earned with this classification toward their graduate degree. The CEND credits,
grades, and quality points become a part of the student's academic record and
grade point average. CEND credit can be transferred provided that: (a) the
course was at the 600 or 800 level, (b) the course was taken within the time
limit appropriate for the degree, (c) the course was approved by the student's
adviser and the Director/Assistant Director of the School of Education, and (d)
the course was in accord with the requirements for the degree.
H.
Transfer of Credit from Another Institution
Graduate credit
earned at another institution will be evaluated at the written request of the
student. Such a request should be submitted first to his or her advisor using a
Request for Transfer of Graduate Credit form. A maximum of 9 credits required
for the degree will be accepted provided that such credits: (a) were earned with
a grade of no less than B-, (b) are approved by the student's adviser and the
Director/Assistant Director of the School of Education, (c) are in accord with
the requirements of the degree, (d) are not older than five years, and (e) were
completed at an accredited college or university. The credits, but not the
grades or quality points, are transferable to University of Delaware graduate
records. Graduate courses counted toward a degree received elsewhere may not be
used. Credits earned at another institution while the student was classified as
a continuing education student at that institution are not eligible to be
transferred to one's graduate degree at the University of Delaware. Credits from
institutions outside of the United States are generally not transferable to the
University of Delaware.
I.
Transfer of Credit from the Undergraduate Division at the University of
Delaware
Students
who wish to transfer credits from their undergraduate record to their graduate
record may transfer a limited number by arranging with the department to have
these courses approved by their instructors before the courses are taken. These
courses must be at the 600-level, and the student must perform at the graduate
level. They must be in excess of the total required for the baccalaureate
degree, must have grades of no less than B-, and must not be older than five
years. The credits, grades, and quality points will transfer.
ASSESSMENT OF LIBRARY RESOURCES
SELF STUDY REPORT for
the
Educational Specialist in School Psychology
Program
Prepared by Marika Ginsburg-Block Ph.D., Program Coordinator
Fall 2011
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE
PROGRAM
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY
The school psychology program at the University of Delaware was first established in 1981, with the first class consisting of two students admitted in the fall of 1982. From 1981 to 1983, the program had two part-time faculty members in school psychology. At that time it was envisioned that the program would train school psychologists for the state of Delaware, and would eventually become nationally accredited. The Specialist program (previously the certificate program and since 2005 the degree program) has been approved by the National Association of School Psychologists since 1994. Three faculty members are assigned full-time to the school psychology program. Adjunct faculty and faculty in other program areas (e.g., special education, measurement) also teach courses in the program.
The School Psychology Program is based on the Standards for
School Psychology Training Programs developed by the National Association of
School Psychologists (2000). The program is grounded in the
scientist/practitioner model in psychology, and committed to the School of
Education's emphasis on the roles of Scholar, Problem Solver, and Partner.
Students are provided with a strong foundation in psychological theory and
research and are trained to use a collaborative, data-based problem solving
approach when applying this foundation to help solve social, emotional, and
academic problems faced by children, schools, and families. In addition to
gaining theoretical and empirical knowledge, students acquire competencies in
multiple skill areas, a problem solving mindset, and sensitivity and respect for
cultural and individual diversity. Consistent with the scientist/practitioner
model and the role of Scholar, students are also expected to contribute to the
knowledge base in psychology and education -- an expectation that is most clear
in the doctoral program. The program's philosophy is reflected in the following
goals:
1.
Students will adhere to the highest standards of ethical
and professional conduct and will demonstrate respect for the dignity, worth,
and individual differences of children of all cultures and backgrounds.
2.
Students will use multiple methods of gathering reliable
and valid data in the design and implementation of a variety of
empirically-supported interventions for addressing problems faced by children,
schools, and families.
3.
Students will acquire an in-depth understanding of
modern theories and research in the cognitive, physical, social, and emotional
development of children, including knowledge of family and school systems, and
will apply such knowledge to the practice of school psychology.
4.
Students will develop a strong knowledge base specific
to the profession of school psychology including its history and foundations,
the various roles and functions of school psychologists, and alternative models
by which services are delivered.
5.
Students will acquire and apply specific competencies in
school psychology, especially in the areas of assessment, consultation,
prevention, and direct interventions, while using an ecological, problem-solving
approach in the delivery of psychological services in the schools.
6.
Students will acquire the knowledge and skills necessary
to design and implement comprehensive mental health services, especially
school-based services for promoting mental health and preventing social,
emotional, and academic problems.
7.
Students will work collaboratively and effectively with
teachers, administrators, support staff, community agencies, children and their
families, and others in the delivery of psychological services in the schools.
8.
Students will apply a data-based, scientific problem
solving approach to the delivery of all services, including assessment and
intervention. Such services will be guided by current research and an
appropriate assessment and analysis of multiple individual and ecological
factors that influence learning and development. Evaluation data will be
collected to demonstrate that services lead to positive outcomes. Where
appropriate, students will use technology effectively in the delivery of
assessment and intervention services, including on the acquisition and
communication of information.
9.
Students will develop sufficient knowledge and skills in
research, statistics, and evaluation and apply such knowledge and skills in the
design and evaluation of programs and services in the schools.
10.
Students will develop the knowledge and skills in
technology to apply in assessment, record keeping, communication, intervention,
research, statistics, and evaluation, as well as other areas related to school
psychological services.
11.
An additional goal for students in the Ph.D. program is
that they will conduct scholarly research in which they demonstrate competence
in identifying critical problems in education and psychology, reviewing and
integrating existing research, designing studies and experiments that
competently address such problems, collecting and analyzing data using a variety
of modern statistical procedures, and formally communicating results to other
researchers and practitioners.
Approved by the National Association of School Psychologists (NASP), the program balances applied skills with the related knowledge of research and theory. Unlike many other programs, students acquire approximately 1,800 hours of field experience through practicum and internship experiences in diverse settings. Although most hours are spent in culturally diverse public schools, students may work in mental health centers, hospitals, alternative programs, and various other settings committed to the mental health and education of children and families, including schools for low incidence disabilities. In each of these settings students apply and extend the knowledge and skills learned in their coursework. Further, in each setting students gain greater recognition and appreciation of individual differences. Note that our practica requirements greatly exceed those required by NASP and most other training programs -- and, our students have viewed this as a major strength of our program.
Each year, approximately 8 outstanding students are admitted to the Specialist level. Currently, approximately 24 full-time students (including interns) are enrolled. As a result, classes which are shared with Doctoral level students (no more than 2) are very small, fostering not only quality instruction but also the development of close student/student and faculty/student relationships.
UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC
PRIORITIES
The Specialist Program in School Psychology intersects strategically with all 5 of the Universities Path to Prominence guiding principles. Addressing the notion of Delaware First, the program is the only program of its kind in Delaware. In recent years, although our matriculated students come to us from across the country and world, a significant and unprecedented number of Ed.S. graduates have chosen to pursue employment in Delaware (80% over the past two years as opposed to 40% in 2006). We attribute this to the strong connections we have established with local schools where our graduates are in high demand, coupled with the economic outlook in other states as far as educational hiring practices. This contributes greatly to the Delaware schools by providing them with highly qualified professionals. Reciprocally, the University benefits through increased training opportunities in the future as we place new students with our newly minted professionals for field-based experiences. Currently many of our highest demand supervisors are indeed past graduates of our program.
Regarding Diversity, our program brings in students from around the country and world (e.g. Turkey, China) from different racial and ethnic backgrounds. The study if school psychology is truly the study of human differences. Our students experience working in Delaware schools serving K-12 students from diverse economic, racial, sexual orientation, linguistic, and disability backgrounds.
Regarding Partnerships, the School Psychology Program has relationships with all of the school districts in New Castle County, as well as several in southern Delaware. Delaware districts provide field-based training opportunities for our practicum students, as well as paid internship sites for our interns during their third year of study. This fall we initiated a partnership with the Department of Education through Dr. Mike Stetter, Director of Accountability. He is going to provide an internship rotation through the DOE for two of our lucky interns.
The principles of Engagement and Impact fit quite well with the field of school psychology and our graduate program which addresses vexing barriers to student achievement by training highly qualified personnel to provide leadership in the provision of school-based mental health services to K-12 students. Our graduates are currently employed as school psychologists across the country. They are serving as lead psychologists in their districts and as state leaders in their professional organizations. They are engaging in much needed work in the field of education and making an impact. For example, here in Delaware graduates of our program are advising the state DOE on the development of its system for annual appraisals of school psychologists and partnering with the DOE and Autism Delaware to provide state-wide inservice opportunities.
GENERAL EDUCATION
REQUIREMENTS
The Educational Specialist in School Psychology degree program is a graduate program and does not enroll undergraduates, thus fulfillment of general education requirements is not applicable here.
CURRICULAR REQUIREMENTS
Please note that these requirements are taken from our student handbook and written for our students, thus when the text refers to you we mean our students.
The Specialist program requires three years of full-time study.
With special permission from the student's advisor and program coordinator, the
equivalent of one year of coursework may be completed part-time. Upon completion
of the first year of coursework (30 credits) and passing of a comprehensive
exam, students are awarded a Master of Arts (M.A.) in School Psychology. All
students are expected to continue their studies to earn the Educational
Specialist Degree in School Psychology, which requires 30 additional credits
including a 1,200-hour internship.
It is only upon completion of the full 60-hour integrated program that a student
is eligible for certification as a school psychologist in Delaware as well as
most other states.
Coursework
for Specialist Students
Please
note that there are several changes that appear to the required coursework
leading to the MA and Specialist Degrees as compared to the 2005 Faculty Senate
Request Form (see pages 8-10 of this report). These changes were submitted
during the fall of 2007 and approved by the Faculty Senate in Spring 2008 and
are listed in the Prograsm Policy Statement.
First
Year (Master's Level)
During
the first year, you complete the following coursework during the Fall, Spring,
and Winter or Summer session. During the session in which you take your final
course, you become eligible to take the comprehensive exam. Passing this exam
qualifies you to receive your Master's degree.
Fall
Semester (12 credits)
§
EDUC 618: Introduction
to School Psychology
§
EDUC 663: Counseling
Skills Laboratory
§
EDUC 817: Individual
Intelligence Testing
§
EDUC 744: Educational
Measurement and Progress Monitoring
Winter
Session (6 credits)
§
EDUC 814:
Psychological Assessment of Children
§
EDUC 623: Applied
Human Development
Spring
Semester (12 Credits)
§
EDUC 671: Practicum in
School Psychology
§
EDUC 679: Instructing
Elementary/Middle Schoolers with Mild Disabilities
§
EDUC 830: Consultation
and Intervention: School Discipline
§
EDUC 870: Child
Neuropsychology
Second
Year (Specialist level)
In the second year, students complete
the following Specialist coursework, which includes the practica:
Fall
Semester (12 credits)
§
EDUC 831: Advanced
Counseling Techniques
§
EDUC 671: Practicum in
School Psychology
§
EDUC 691: Applied
Statistics and Research Design
§
EDUC 813: Child
Psychopathology
Spring
Semester (12 Credits)
§
EDUC 671: Practicum in
School Psychology
§
EDUC 651: School-Based
Family Issues and Interventions
§
EDUC 841: Consultation
and Intervention: Mental Health
§
EDUC 842: Assessment
of Special Populations
Third
Year (Internship)
During the third and final year of
the School Psychology Specialist Program, students complete the following
requirements:
§
Enroll in EDUC 688: Internship in
School Psychology, for 3 credits or 6 credits per
semester
§
Pass the PRAXIS Exam
in School Psychology
§
Complete the portfolio
and have it approved
§
Complete the
Application for Advanced Degree for conferral of the Specialist
Degree
Note: Students who choose to enroll for 3 credits of internship
may not be considered "full-time students" for the purpose of deferring student
loans. Students are responsible for determining their loan
status.
Minimum
GPA of 3.5
Students must maintain a minimum
cumulative grade point average of 3.5 to be eligible for the Master's and
Specialist degree. Students also must obtain a grade of B- or higher in each
practica in order advance to the next level of the program. Additionally, a
grade of B- or higher is required during each semester of the internship in
order to complete the program and receive the Specialist degree. Note that
proficiency in oral and written expression in English is among the requirements
in practica and the internship.
Comprehensive
Examination
The comprehensive examination is
administered to first-year students, usually during the last week of the Spring
semester. Alternate exam times are sometimes arranged for students who wish to
participate in Winter or Summer graduation. The exam consists of several essay
questions covering material from first-year courses. Successful completion of
the exam and coursework results in the Master of Arts degree. The exam is graded
by two or more members of the school psychology faculty. Student identities are
masked for the purpose of exam grading. Students failing the exam are given the
opportunity to take a second exam. At the discretion of the faculty, this second
exam may cover all or part of the first year course material and may be written
and/or oral. Students must pass the second administration in order to continue
in the program.
Three carefully constructed practica
(3 separate courses for a total of 9 credits) are a part of every student's
program. The first practicum course orients students to the educational process
and focuses on assessment skills. In addition to administering and interpreting
a variety of assessment tools, students implement an academic intervention with
an individual child and conduct a functional behavior assessment linked to
intervention. In the second and third practica, students refine their assessment
skills and develop expertise in direct and indirect interventions (e.g.,
individual and group counseling, teacher and family consultation, design and
implementation of behavior management programs, social skills training).
Practicum experiences also are embedded with more content-based courses. For
example, during the first semester students shadow and interview a school
psychologist and administer a variety of intelligence
tests.
Practicum assignments are made by
faculty to ensure that students gain experience with children of a variety of
ages, cultures, and disabilities. Practica require 2 full days per week and are
completed in regular school settings; however, one practicum may be completed in
a more "specialized" setting, such as programs for children with physical and/or
sensory impairments, alternative schools, schools for children with autism or
other severe disabilities. Students interested in a particular area should
discuss possible placements with the University practicum supervisor.
Supervision is provided on-site by a certified school psychologist; students
also attend weekly group supervision meetings with a University faculty member.
For students in the specialist
program, an internship is completed in the third year of training. Doctoral
students complete the internship during the fifth year in the program. The
objective of the internship is to insure competency and integration of knowledge
and skills in all domains of school psychology and to broaden such knowledge and
skills.
The internship is a culminating
experience during which students not only continue to develop a full range of
competencies across all domains of school psychology practice, but more
importantly demonstrate the integration and application of such competencies.
The internship requires full-time participation, five days per week for one
academic year. Interns must log a minimum of 1,200 clock hours (1,500 for
Ph.D.). Internship sites follow guidelines established by the National
Association of School Psychologists, as outlined in the Internship Guidelines.
A plan of objectives and activities,
which are consistent with goals of the program, are delineated and evaluated on
the Field Experience Checklist and Evaluation Form. As described in the
Internship Guidelines, a written contract between the University, internship
site, and intern must be formalized prior to beginning an internship. This
contract states the responsibilities of the training program, the internship
site, and the intern. The internship is a collaboration between the training
program and field site program. A written plan specifies the responsiblities of
the training program and internship site in providing supervision, support, and
both formative and summative performance-based evaluation of intern performance.
Students typically handle a case load roughly half of that required for a
certified school psychologist. They must participate in a minimum of 4 hours of
weekly supervision from a certified school psychologist (or someone with other
appropriate credentials for placements in non-school settings) and log at least
1,200 clock hours (1,500 for Ph.D.) that document a full range of experiences
and services with a diverse population of students. During the internship,
competencies in the domains of school psychology are assessed not only by field
supervisors using the Field Experience Checklist Evaluation Form, but also by
the University supervisors' evalution of a comprehensive portfolio that includes
counseling and consultation tapes, a psychological report, a comprehensive case
study (documenting positive outcomes), documentation of professional development
activities, and a PowerPoint presentation (to school psychologists and students)
on a system-wide intervention or evaluation project that they completed.
Finding an appropriate internship
site is the joint responsibility of the university supervisor and the student.
While every effort is made to arrange for a paid internship, paid internships
are not guaranteed. However, over the past ten years all interns have been
offered paid internships (averaging about $16,000). Students have completed
their internships in Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, Virginia, Massachusetts,
North Carolina, Florida, Iowa, Illinois, Texas, and
Alaska.
Placements must be approved by the
university supervisor. Although the supervisor attempts to place interns in
locations that they most desire, the program's obligations to local school
districts must be respected. As such, the University may require that an
internship be completed in a local school district. Likewise, quality
of the site is always considered to be more important than a high salary.
RESULTS OF
PROGRAM QUALITY ASSESSMENTS
Assessment data are continuously collected throughout the three-year program and used to make improvements. NASP/NCATE requires the use of 6-8 program assessments (7 & 8 are optional) to indicate program quality. The assessments we use for this purpose are the 1) Praxis II National Examination in School Psychology, 2) course grades, 3) practicum and 4) internship ratings by field supervisors, 5) a 5-item internship portfolio,6) a comprehensive case study (which is also part of the internship portfolio), and 7) alumni surveys. A list of these assessments including a brief description and timeline for administration can be found in this report (See Other Information, page 44). Three years of cohort data for each assessment along with a brief analysis of this data may be found in this report (See Other Information sections A through H, beginning on page 47).
We also rely on the following
additional assessments for program improvement:
1. Course and Instructor
Evaluations. As required by the University, students complete a course
and instructor evaluation form (now on-line) at the end of each course. We take
these evaluations seriously. Results are reviewed by the individual faculty
member and by the Director of the School of Education, both of whom examine
aggregated scores as well as written comments from students. This information is
used not only to improve courses and instruction, but also is used to help
determine the promotion and salaries of individual, full-time faculty
members.
2. Candidate Evaluations of Field
Supervisors and Placements. In addition to evaluating courses and course
instructors, candidates are required to evaluate practica and internship
placements and the respective supervisors. Evaluations are confidential and used
by the university-based field supervisor and program coordinator to select and
maintain quality sites. (See Program
Handbook, Site Evaluation
Form).
http://www.udel.edu/education/masters/psychology/handbook/appendix-c.html
3. Exit Interviews of Interns. Near
the end of the internship, interns are interviewed individually and asked how
the program might be improved.
Each fall, the above information is reviewed by the school psychology faculty. As seen in the results of the alumni surveys (See Other Information, page 97) feedback on the program has been very positive. In respect to feedback that has impacted our program, we have benefited mostly from responses to the exit interview and the survey of alumni. This is because the other assessments (i.e., the PRAXIS, course grades, field supervisor ratings, competency ratings by faculty, and internship portfolio requirements) have consistently been overwhelmingly positive, seldom providing much guidance with respect to the need for programmatic changes (with a few exceptions, as noted below). Feedback from the alumni survey and exit interviews from these two sources has been instrumental to several recent program changes. Based on the above sources, the following actions have been made to improve the program:
Content
Knowledge
1. In response to several respondents indicating a need for greater attention to Response to Intervention (RTI), Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA), and academic interventions, in 2009 we replaced the course EDUC 680 Educational Diagnosis with EDUC 744 Educational Measurement and Progress Monitoring. We also included more on these topics in the first practicum EDUC 671, requiring additional readings and a field-based assignment (linked to the course, EDUC 679: Instructing Elementary/Middle Schoolers with Mild Disabilities, which is taken concurrently with the practicum) in which the candidate must assess a child and use on-going progress monitoring while implementing an academic intervention.
2. A recurrent recommendation in alumni surveys and exit interviews has been the need for a course on assessment and intervention for children with low incidence disabilities, especially children with autism. Thus, last year (spring, 2010) we implemented a newly required course, EDUC 842: Assessment of Special Populations. This new course, taught by an adjunct and graduate of our program who now works with children with low incidence disabilities, received extremely favorable reviews last spring.
3. In response to the 2008 alumni survey and exit interviews suggesting greater coverage of Domain 4 (Diversity), we not only added EDUC 842 (see response above) but also revised the course EDUC 651: School-Based Family Issues and Interventions, adding more on diversity (which is also covered in additional courses and field experiences). Reflecting the increased coverage of the topic of diversity, we changed the title to Diversity and Family School Collaboration.
4. In response to several respondents indicating the need for greater attention to Functional Behavior Assessment (FBA) and behavior intervention plans, in 2008 we created a second consultation course. Previously, one consultation course was required, EDUC 830, Consultation and Intervention in the Schools. This was replaced by a new version of EDUC 830, entitled Consultation and Intervention: School Discipline (a course entitled EDUC 658, School Discipline and Classroom Management, was deleted, but with much of its content incorporated into the new EDUC 830). A second consultation course, EDUC 841: Consultation and Intervention: Mental Health, was added. As part of EDUC 830, and in the context of their first practicum (EDUC 679), candidates must conduct a comprehensive FBA and link it to a recommended behavior intervention plan. The following year, and in the context of their third practicum, candidates take EDUC 841, which requires a comprehensive FBA linked to actual interventions that candidates assist a teacher in implementing (via collaborative problem solving consultation). For both projects a written report (including a formal FBA and behavior intervention plan) and consultation video are required (the second project also requires results of progress monitoring).
5. The above addition of a second course in consultation also addressed the recommendation of several graduates that more attention be given to systems level consultation and to crisis intervention. The new course, EDUC 841: Consultation and Intervention: Mental Health, places increased attention on these two topics. This includes the requirement that students conduct a thorough needs assessment of the school in which they are placed for their third practicum and link the results to recommended system-level changes. The needs assessment includes mental health prevention and crisis response.
Professional and
Pedagogical Knowledge, skill, and Dispositions
Nearly all of the above changes address not only content knowledge but also professional and pedagogical knowledge, skill, and dispositions (we find it very difficult to separate these from content knowledge). Candidates practice and demonstrate also professional and pedagogical knowledge, skill, and dispositions in their assessment and on-going progress monitoring of academic achievement in EDUC 679 and EDUC 744 (see response #1 above). They also demonstrate professional and pedagogic al knowledge, skill, and dispositions (via required video) in EDUC 830 and 841 (see response #4 above).
Student
Learning
In the projects cited above, candidates are required to demonstrate the impact of interventions on student learning. For example, in EDUC 679 candidates monitor and assess the impact of academic interventions that they implement and in EDUC 841 they assess the impact of interventions targeting behavior problems that are implemented via collaborative problem solving consultation (these are in addition to comprehensive case study required in internship).
External Evaluation
Results
The extent to which our Specialist Program meets NASP/NCATE standards is evaluated externally every 5 years when we re-submit an extensive application for renewal of our national accreditation. Most recent reviews were conducted in 2006 and 2011 and both yielded full program approval by the National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) in conjunction with NCATE.
NASP organizes their program review
according to 4 Standards. A table indicating how our program fulfills each
section of NASPs National Standard 1 (Program Context/Structure) can be found
in this report (See Other Information, page 109). Feedback from NASP/NCATE
indicated that we met each of the requirements for this important standard, as
well as for Standard 2 which addresses 11 core training and practice domains,
including: 1) data-based decision making, 2) consultation and collaboration, 3)
instruction and development of cognitive/academic skills, 4) socialization and
development of life skills, 5) student diversity, 6) school and systems
organization, 7) prevention, crisis intervention, and mental health, 8) home,
school, and community collaboration, 9) research and program evaluation, 10)
school psychology practice and development, and 11) information technology. In
addition we met all of the requirements for Standard 3 which addresses field
experiences, including practica and internship. Finally, we met all of the
requirements for Standard 4, Performance-based Program Assessment and
Accountability.
Feedback obtained in August 2011 from NASP/NCATE on our assessment tools and results was overwhelmingly favorable, while some suggestions were made which our faculty will take under consideration. Those comments can be found in this report as well (See Other Information, page 108).
STUDENT
ADVISEMENT STRATEGIES
Specialist students have no
electives during their three-year MA/Educational Specialist Program. Therefore
advisement about course selection is not required. Faculty advisors are
available however to help students with their career planning or to address any
faculty or student concerns that may come up. Each student is assigned to a
faculty advisor upon admission to the program. Each students progress towards
meeting the academic standards of the program is reviewed annually by the
faculty as per Faculty Senate and NASP/NCATE requirements. Students in the
school psychology program are required to maintain a 3.5 GPA in order to
graduate. The outcome of these annual evaluations is shared with students,
including meetings with individual students, as needed. In addition to graded
coursework (which includes the assessment of knowledge, as well as specific
performance-based skills in several courses that involve course-linked practicum
experiences), students' progress is evaluated through a comprehensive exam and
performance in three separate practica and an internship. Field-based school
psychologists/supervisors play an active and critical role in the evaluation
process. Our faculty-student ratio (also required by NASP/NCATE) is 10 students
per each full-time faculty member. Given the small size of many of our seminar
classes, students have easy access to all program faculty and often discuss
advisement questions with our faculty interchangeably.
Student Assessment Process
At any decision point, a student may not be permitted to progress to the next level if satisfactory performance has not been demonstrated. The Field Experience Checklist and Evaluation Form which is completed by field-based supervisors, outlines procedures for evaluating progress in practicum and internship experiences.
http://www.udel.edu/education/masters/psychology/handbook/appendix-a.html
Throughout coursework and field experiences, students must
adhere to the University's Code of Conduct, which is published in the Official
Student Handbook. Additionally, students are expected to know
the ethical standards of the National Association of School Psychologists and
abide by them. Procedures for evaluating professional and ethical standards are
directly linked to both the University's Code of Conduct and the ethical
standards established by the National Association of School
Psychologists.
As students progress through the program, their progress in assessment, counseling, and consultation is evaluated using specific rubrics which can be found on our website: http://www.udel.edu/education/masters/psychology/handbook/appendix-e.html. Note that similar evaluation tools are used throughout the program; however, students' performance is evaluated relative to their levels of training. That is, the performance considered "adequate" for each element is gradually increased over the course of the program. These rubrics are used, at a minimum, within one formal course or practicum, and the internship portfolio. Additional information about the performance-based assessments can be found in the Practicum Guidelines and Internship Guidelines on our website. Note also that the student gives feedback to the program regarding each semester's practicum placement using a Site Evaluation Form.
Interns at both the specialist and
doctoral levels must satisfactorily complete internship portfolios consisting of
a comprehensive psychological report, a comprehensive case study that links
assessment to an effective intervention, demonstration (via tapes) of effective
counseling and consultation skills, documentation of professional development
activities, and a "special project" that demonstrates systems-level involvement
in a prevention program, curriculum program, or program evaluation. Each
portfolio item is evaluated by the university supervisor. Interns also are
evaluated by their field supervisors using the Field
Experience Checklist and Evaluation Form at the close of each
semester of internship for the purpose of assessing skills in all domains of
school psychology practice. Internship logs, submitted the first of every month,
also are evaluated by the university-based supervisor and feedback on the logs
is given to the intern.
Additionally, interns are required to
achieve a passing score (165) on the National School Psychology Examination
administered by the Educational Testing Service. The School Psychologist test,
code 10400, is administered through the Praxis Series of Educational Testing
Service. Information about the test and available test dates are available on
the NASP web
page and the Delaware
Department of Education's web site.
Finally, each intern participates in
an exit interview with one or more program faculty to evaluate progress, plan
for ongoing professional development, and offer feedback on strengths/weaknesses
of the program.
Assessment Process of
Interpersonal and Professional Competencies
Because all candidates will be working and collaborating with
students, families, teachers, and administrators, the program recognizes the
importance of interpersonal and professional competencies, in addition to
traditional academic skills. These competencies are carefully monitored by
faculty and site supervisors through course work and practicum experiences and
evaluations. At the conclusion of second practicum and of internship, students
will be evaluated by their site supervisors according to the Professional
Dispositions of Effective Educators Form, which assesses the interpersonal and
professional dispositions of students that are necessary to be effective in
todays schools. In accordance with the Professionalism
Policy for Professional Education Programs at the University of
Delaware, all students must review the new policy and complete the
Signature of Professional Education Candidate form prior to participating in any
field experience. More information can be found on the Office of Clinical
Studies website at http://www.udel.edu/ocs/.
When problems are noted, one or more faculty members will meet
with the student, inform him/her of the nature of the concerns, and assist the
student in developing a remediation plan, if necessary. Interpersonal and
professional difficulties subject to remediation plans may include (but are not
limited to): accepting and utilizing feedback in supervision, developing and
maintaining productive working relationships with faculty, peers, colleagues and
clients, and behaving ethically and professionally (including all of the
professional behaviors listed in the Field
Experience Checklist) in practicum and classroom environments. In
addition, personal or mental health problems that interfere with the quality of
a students work may be subject to the provisions of this policy. Remediation
plans may include (but are not limited to) additional practicum experiences,
additional practicum supervision, personal therapy, and/or a leave of
absence.
If the concern is not satisfactorily remediated as agreed upon
by the student and faculty member(s), written notification will be mailed to the
student with details of the reasons for possible dismissal from the program. The
student will have two weeks to prepare a response to such notification and to
ask for a formal review by the school psychology faculty. At such a review
meeting, the faculty and student will both have the opportunity to present their
perceptions of the situation. The faculty committee will then make a final
determination regarding dismissal.
Procedures for Dismissal from
the Program
If in the professional judgment of the school psychology faculty
a student has failed to make satisfactory progress toward meeting the standards
of the program, the faculty may vote to dismiss that student from the program.
Rarely have students been dismissed. Dismissal may occur for the following
reasons: (a) failure to maintain the required GPA (i.e., 3.5), (b) failure to
complete practicum requirements, (c) ethical violations (e.g., plagiarism,
cheating), (d) failure to pass the comprehensive exam in school psychology, and
(e) serious deficiencies in interpersonal or professional competencies (as
described above). When a student violates ethical standards or demonstrates
deficiencies in interpersonal or professional competencies, the decision as to
whether the student will be offered an opportunity to remediate deficiencies or
will be immediately recommended for dismissal is solely at the discretion of the
faculty.
In the case of dismissal, the program coordinator will send a
report to the Office of Graduate Studies that states the faculty vote on the
decision causing dismissal and the justification for this action. The Office of
Graduate Studies will notify the student in writing when the student is being
dismissed for failure to make satisfactory progress in the
program.
Appeals
Students may appeal faculty decisions. Students should address
requests for course waivers and appeals related to faculty interpretations of
these guidelines to the School of Education Graduate Studies Committee. Appeals
of grade and decisions to dismiss students from the program follow University
procedures and are handled outside the School. For these decisions, students
should follow the Academic Appeals process outlined in the University Catalog.
Students should keep in mind that all the regulations and guidelines in the
University Catalog apply to them over and beyond the requirements in this
document.
PROGRAM ACCREDITATION
REQUIREMENTS
In order to maintain full accreditation from the National Association of School Psychologists our program must conform to the NASP Standards for Graduate Preparation of School Psychologists. These can be viewed using the following link:
http://www.nasponline.org/standards/2010standards/1_Graduate_Preparation.pdf
Currently our program is aligned with the 2000 version of the standards; however, beginning January 1, 2015 our program will be required to demonstrate alignment with the 2010 revision of the Standards. The new Standards have been reorganized yet they are quite similar to the older version; therefore, our program should have no problem demonstrating this alignment. We will however consider necessary changes to the program beginning Spring 2012 such that any needed changes may be proposed during the Fall 2012 semester. This will allow us to have at least 3 years of data collection in line with the new Standards before our program is up for another national review.
ADMISSION CRITERIA AND DEGREE
REQUIREMENTS
The School Psychology Program seeks candidates for admission
with qualities that will enable them to become outstanding school
psychologists. School psychologists
must have the skills to analyze educational problems at all levels of the
system; design, implement, and evaluate interventions to prevent or solve these
problems; and collaborate with families, educators, and community members to
promote healthy educational and psychological outcomes for all children. Therefore, we seek candidates who
demonstrate the following dispositions:
Applicants are judged individually. However, the following are
required and guide the admission process:
Courses designed to remediate deficiencies in an applicant's background may
be required. Credit for these courses would not apply to the program's required
credit hours.
The School of Education will accept as many as 9 graduate
credits toward the Master's degree. Applicants should inquire about possible
transfer credits early in the admissions process because certain courses may not
be taken elsewhere.
Students' applications are reviewed by at least two faculty
members. Approximately 15 of the most promising candidates are selected for
personal interviews. Candidates' grades, test scores, letters of recommendation,
and personal statements are reviewed for evidence of the qualities and
predispostions listed above.
The interview process consists of three components. First,
students participate in a small group orientation (usually about five students
are included in a group). During this process, candidates introduce themselves
to each other, listen to a presentation about the program from faculty, and ask
questions about the program. Second, candidates participate in a series of 15-20
minute individual interviews with at least two faculty members. Third,
candidates have the opportunity to talk with one or two current students in the
program. The first two portions of the interview are evaluative; candidates'
statements, questions, and interactional style are observed for evidence of the
qualities and predispostions listed below. The third part of the interview is
confidential. This conversation allows candidates to receive candid information
about the program without concern for how their questions might be perceived by
faculty.
Following the interviews, candidates are 1) offered admission,
2) placed on the waiting list, or 3) not accepted. Each year's entering class consists of
6-10 students. There is no
provisional acceptance.
Please note that admission to the program is competitive. Those who meet stated requirements are
not guaranteed admission, nor are those who fail to meet all of those
requirements necessarily precluded from admission if they offer other
appropriate strengths.
RECRUITING PROCEDURES
During campus interviews with our prospective candidates we usually ask students how they learned about our program. Most often it is from our website or word of mouth from a faculty member at their undergraduate institution, friend or relative. As a nationally accredited program we are listed on the National Association of School Psychologists website which includes a link to our website. This has proven to be a valuable recruitment tool as students seek accredited institutions within a specific region. Prior to 2008 we had a password protected handbook online. Since the handbook contains such rich information about the program which is useful to prospective students we removed the password and have made our handbook public. Since that time (and prior) we have received numerous compliments about how informative our website is compared to other institutions. Given the national and international reputations of our faculty members word of mouth has also proven to be a tremendous source of applicants to our program. We can count on colleagues from other institutions sending us a steady stream of their qualified undergraduates.
Beginning last fall (2010) the School of Education began a fall open house for prospective students with breakout sessions for each graduate program. We had a sizeable number of students attend and then follow-up with submitting their applications. Our graduate program staff (Gail Rys & Christina Johnston) also visit college fairs and court potential students for our program. Last year I believe they visited Penn State University, as well as an event geared towards recruiting from historically black colleges, among other venues.
STUDENT INFORMATION
APPLICATION AND ENROLLMENT
HISTORY
Approximately 60-70 students apply for admission to the
MA/Ed.S. Programs in School Psychology annually, competing for 8 positions.
Acceptance rates vary across years ranging from 10-15%. Our
matriculated students on average have GPAs from their undergraduate
institutions of 3.5 or above and average GRE scores of 1150-1200 (verbal and
quantitative combined). Students are admitted into the M.A. program and
after successful completion of their 30 credits in the M.A. program and a
comprehensive exam, students are automatically matriculated into the Ed.S.
Program. Below is a table containing information about the ethnic/racial status
of our matriculated students as well as program completion rates. Since 2006,
the first year that the Educational Specialist degree was awarded, we have
graduated 45 students with more than a 95% completion rate. Overall, 20% of our
graduates in the past 6 years were minorities and 87% were women.
Program: Specialist | |||||
Academic
Year Admitted/Graduated |
#
of Candidates Admitted to the Program |
#
of Program Completers10 | |||
|
Female Minority |
Female
Non-minority |
Male
Minority |
Male
Non-Minority |
|
2009-2010/2012 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
1 |
8
(expected) |
2008-2009/2011 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
2007-2008/2010 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
8 |
2006-2007/2009 |
1 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
2005-2006/2008 |
2 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
2004-2005/2007 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
2003-2004/2006 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
Note that these numbers include 2 Ph.D. students who also obtained the Ed.S. degree during the graduation year indicated. They may have been admitted into an earlier class since their program takes several years longer to complete.
PLACEMENT OF GRADUATES
In the past five years all of our graduates seeking employment upon graduation have been offered jobs within several months of graduation. Our 2010 graduates all had jobs by the second week in July and our recent 2011 cohort by September. While we assist students in any way that we can, such as calling upon colleagues and providing letters of reference, we do not place our graduates. We have information about the location of their jobs listed on our website.
http://www.udel.edu/education/masters/psychology/handbook/interns-and-grads.html
Our graduates are employed across the nation. Regionally they have positions in Delaware, New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Maryland, while they have gone as far as California, Michigan, Connecticut, and Arizona.
We are extremely proud of our graduates, many of whom have taken leadership positions in their schools and state associations. For example, one of our 2009 graduates, Cathy Holland, is the current President of the Delaware Association of School Psychologists.
FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR
STUDENTS
Our students are highly sought after for graduate
assistantships and in the past 8 years 100% of our specialists have been funded
during their two years of didactic training prior to internship. This funding
includes a 20 hour per week graduate assistantship for which students receive a
stipend of approximately $16,000 per year along with tuition remission. Funding is not; however, guaranteed to
Educational Specialist students. Our students obtain assistantships from funded
faculty and center-based research, Student Life, the Education Resource Center,
Disability Support Services, etc. Our minority students have been extremely
successful in obtaining competitive University Graduate Scholarship Awards
through the Office of Graduate and Professional Education at the University. All
students matriculated who have applied have received this award supporting them
for the two years during which they took coursework at UD prior to internship.
In addition, students remaining in Delaware for their internship (year 3) have
been able to obtain a stipend of $16,000 to $17,000 from collaborating school
districts including Christina, Appoquinimink, Colonial, Smyrna, and Caesar
Rodney.
FACTORS FOR ATTRACTING
STUDENTS
Annual exit interviews with our graduating interns reveal that the most attractive features of our program include our small size, collegial students, program faculty, funding opportunities, and numerous field-experiences. All of our students report being extremely prepared for their internship year and first year as school psychologists. These are the features that we emphasize during campus interviews and in our online materials. For additional information about student funding, which is seen as an important factor in matriculation decisions by our top applicants, see section on Financial Support for Students (page 41). Greater elaboration on outstanding students, faculty and an innovative curriculum is provided in the section that follows on Program Uniqueness.
PROGRAM UNIQUENESS
The University of Delaware
consistently ranks among the top 25 universities in the nation, offering
exceptional library and technology resources as well as an attractive learning
environment. UDs School of Education is ranked 26th for best graduate programs
in education in by US News and World Report. The Specialist Program in
School Psychology at the University of Delaware is the only program to offer the
Specialist Degree in the state of Delaware. There is no overlap in terms of
degree granting with any other professional training programs at UD. A perusal
of the National Association of School Psychologists website reveals that our
program is among only a handful of nationally accredited programs in the region.
Within this context we believe that our program is among the top school
psychology programs in the nation -- a claim based on an established history of
outstanding students, faculty and an innovative curriculum.
As previously stated, with an
acceptance rate of 10-15%, our students on average have GPAs from their
undergraduate institutions of 3.5 or above and average GRE scores of 1150-1200
(verbal and quantitative combined). Our completion rate is high with more than
95% of students completing their degrees within 3 years. As stated previously,
our students are highly sought after for graduate assistantships and in the past
8 years 100% of our specialists have been funded during their two years of
didactic training prior to internship. Regarding our faculty, we have published
in each of the major journals in school psychology, developmental psychology,
educational psychology, and special education and have assumed leadership roles
in school psychology at the national and state levels. For example, during the
2010-2011 school year, Kathy Minke served as President of the National
Association of School Psychologists (NASP) and Marika Ginsburg-Block served as
President of the Delaware Association of School Psychologists (DASP). George
Bear has served on the NASP Program Approval Board Executive Committee for many
years, and he is currently an Associate Editor of the School Psychology Review,
the top journal in our field, among numerous other contributions. Finally,
regarding our curriculum, it is sequenced such that didactic courses are paired
strategically with field-based experiences beginning in the first year of the
program. Unlike many other programs, students acquire approximately 1,800 hours
of field experience through practicum and internship experiences in diverse
settings. Also unique to our program, the faculty has worked to cultivate
positive relationships with Delaware schools such that our students are paid a
stipend for their work while on internship.
INTERDISCIPLINARY
RELATIONSHIPS
Through coursework, field-based training experiences, and
graduate assistantships our Educational Specialist students are able to interact
with students and faculty in other programs and departments. Given that our
graduate students do not take electives, they are unable to take courses outside
of the program area. The Educational Specialist Program does contain several courses which are sometimes taken by
students in other program areas of the School of Education, Human Development
and Family Studies and areas outside of the College. These courses include EDUC
691: Applied Statistics and Research Design, EDUC 813: Child Psychopathology,
and EDUC 651: School-Based Family Issues and Interventions. In addition, our
students often use the University of Delawares Early Learning Center and the
College School as resources for obtaining K-12 students for practice
administering assessments, as well, as for additional field-based experiences.
Finally, our students are employed across campus where they work with
individuals in other related fields of education, including for example,
disabilities and library science.
PROGRAM FACILITIES
The School Psychology Program is
house within the Willard Hall Education Building. The program office is located
in 210B WHL where student mailboxes are housed along with the graduate program
assistant. In addition 220WHL is often used for class because it shares a
one-way mirror with 210B, which can be used for our counseling and supervision
classes. Other than faculty offices (all of which are located in WHL) and
classroom space there are no other facility requirements specific to the
program.
BUDGETARY REQUIREMENTS
Three full-time faculty are assigned to the School Psychology Program area within the School of Education, Drs. Kathleen Minke, Dr. George Bear and Dr. Marika Ginsburg-Block. Aside from the 6 core courses taught by these faculty members, the remaining 4 Educational Specialist classes are taught by affiliated faculty and adjunct instructors, several of whom are graduates of the program. Other than faculty and instructor salaries, there are no other recurring expenses specific to the school psychology program, which actually has no budget. The School of Education has consistently budgeted funds to support several student and supervisor activities, including an annual luncheon in May for field-based supervisors who receive no honorarium for their supervision services. This budgetary allocation is at the discretion of the School of Education Director.
OTHER INFORMATION
ASSESSMENTS USED TO MEASURE PROGRAM
QUALITY
Name of Assessment[1] |
Type or Form of Assessment[2] |
When the Assessment Is Administered[3] |
||
1 |
[Licensure assessment, or
other content-based assessment (required)] [4]
This must be a state or national school psychology credentialing exam. If
your state does not require a school psychology credentialing exam, then
the Praxis II in School Psychology must be required. |
PRAXIS II National Exam in School
Psychology |
Spring of internship (third) year |
|
2 |
[Assessment of content
(required)] Program or
course-embedded assessment of candidate knowledge. This might consist of a
comprehensive examination, an oral or qualifying exam, an exam embedded in
one or more courses that all candidates complete, and/or grades for
courses in which NASP Standards 2.1-2.11 are addressed. Programs may use a
combination of program or course-embedded content assessment
methods. |
Course grades |
Every semester |
|
3 |
[Assessment of candidate ability to
plan (required)]
Assessment in practica that demonstrates candidates can
effectively plan the professional responsibilities required of a school
psychologist. |
Practicum ratings by field
supervisors |
End of second, third, and fourth
semesters |
|
4 |
[Assessment of clinical practice
(required)] INTERN
EVALUATIONS BY FIELD SUPERVISORS. Assessment that demonstrates candidates'
knowledge, skills, and professional work characteristics/dispositions are
applied effectively in practice during internship |
Internship ratings by field
supervisors |
Twice during third year (End of fall and spring
semesters) |
|
5 |
[Assessment of candidate effect on
student learning (required)]
Comprehensive, Performance-Based Assessment Of Candidate
Abilities Evaluated By Faculty During Internship. |
Portfolio in Internship, consisting of psychological
report linking assessment to intervention, counseling tape, consultation
tape, system-level special project, and comprehensive case
study |
Items submitted at various points during internship,
but prior to completion of internship. |
|
6 |
[Additional assessment
(required)]
Assessment that demonstrates that candidates are able to
integrate domains of knowledge and apply professional skills in delivering
a comprehensive range of services evidenced by measurable positive impact
on children, youth, families, and other consumers. NOTE: You need not have
a separate assessment of this area if it is addressed by assessment 5.
Simply refer to the particular assessment(s) and aggregate the relevant
data (e.g., particular items or sections of an assessment) |
Comprehensive case study (included in Assessment
#5) |
Spring of Internship |
|
7 |
Additional assessment that addresses
NASP standards (optional)] |
Alumni Survey |
Spring, every other year |
|
8 |
Additional assessment that addresses
NASP standards (optional)
] |
|
|
Assessment 1 Data: Content Knowledge --
PRAXIS
NARRATIVE
Brief Description. All candidates are
required to pass the Praxis School Psychologist exam in order to complete the
program.
Alignment with Standards. The subtests
of the PRAXIS can be aligned with the NASP domains, as follows. Since NASP
helped develop this exam and it is used by NASP for credentialing and
accrediting purposes, we see no need to be more specific with respect to
possible linkages of the subtests to the domains and assume that to one extent
or another all domains are covered.
2008 Subtests |
NASP Domain |
2009 & 2010 Subtests |
NASP Domain |
Diagnosis and
Fact-Finding |
2.1,
2.5 |
Data Based Decision
Making: |
2.1 |
Prevention and
Intervention |
2.7, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4,
2.8 |
Academic
Practices |
2.3,
2.6 |
Applied Psychological
Foundations |
2.4, 2.5, 2.8, 2.9,
2.10 |
Behavioral and Mental
Health |
2.4,
2.7 |
Applied Educational
Foundations |
2.3,
2.6 |
Consultation and
Collaboration |
2.2 |
Ethical and Legal
Considerations |
2.10,
2.11 |
Applied Psychological
Foundations |
2.4, 2.5, 2.8, 2.9,
2.10 |
|
|
Ethical and Legal
Considerations |
2.10 , 2.11 |
During the spring of 2008 the
Praxis School Psychologist exam provided scores ranging from 220 to 990.
National average scores were reported to be within the 660 750 range,
representing the middle 50% of examinees with an appropriate educational level
who took the test during the past three years.
Beginning in 2009, scores could
range from 100 to 200, with average scores in the nation reported by ETS to be
167 to 179.
The criterion score for passing the exam prior to 2009 was 660 for our program. Reflecting changes in PRAXIS scoring in 2009, since then the passing score has been 160. A passing score is required for program completion.
Brief Analysis of
Data.
As seen below, for all three cohorts, all
candidates received a passing score (note that no student took the exam twice).
In 2008, the range was 700 to 790, with a mean of 767. In 2009, scores ranged
from 174 to 190, with a mean of 186. In 2010, scores ranged from 171 to 189,
with a mean of 181. Across the three cohorts the average percentage of items
correct ranged from 74 to 92 across subtests.
Brief Interpretation as Evidence of Meeting
Standards.
Given the results cited above, we believe the
PRAXIS provides evidence that our candidates have adequate content knowledge
across the domains, as listed above, measured by the
PRAXIS.
ASSESSMENT
DOCUMENTATION
With the exception of the information above, a description of the PRAXIS and scoring guide are not necessary since this assessment is used widely NASP. The chart summarizing candidate data is presented above, and actual scores are presented below.
Average PRAXIS
Scores for 2008, 2009, and 2010 Cohorts | ||||||||
Class |
% program completers who passed |
PRAXIS average For UD |
Data Based Decision Making (formerly Diagnosis
& Fact Finding) |
Academic Practices (formerly Applied Educational
Foundations) |
Behavioral and Mental Health (formerly Prevention
& Intervention) |
Consultation and
Collaboration |
Applied Psychological
Foundations |
Ethical and Legal
Considerations |
2008 (n =
10) |
100 |
767 |
77 |
77 |
86 |
|
88 |
81 |
2009 (n=
8) |
100 |
186 |
79 |
86 |
90 |
80 |
92 |
86 |
2010 (n = 8) |
100 |
181 |
78 |
82 |
82 |
78 |
84 |
74 |
NOTE: The names of some subtests were changed, as indicated in parentheses, and an additional subtest, Consultation and Collaboration, was added after 2008.
*Subtest scores indicate percent correct
INDIVIDUAL PRAXIS
SCORES
Individual PRAXIS Scores: Class of
2010 | |||||||
Class |
PRAXIS score |
Data Based Decision
Making |
Academic Practices |
Behavioral and Mental
Health |
Consultation and
Collaboration |
Applied Psychological
Foundations |
Ethical and Legal
Considerations |
2010-01 |
184 |
80 |
87 |
94 |
93 |
87 |
64 |
2010-02 |
189 |
90 |
93 |
84 |
93 |
94 |
77 |
2010-03 |
171 |
69 |
71 |
63 |
60 |
81 |
73 |
2010-04 |
172 |
73 |
67 |
72 |
86 |
80 |
50 |
2010-05 |
179 |
76 |
100 |
78 |
71 |
73 |
79 |
2010-06 |
184 |
85 |
87 |
95 |
64 |
88 |
85 |
2010-07 |
181 |
79 |
79 |
84 |
73 |
88 |
80 |
2010-08 |
179 |
72 |
71 |
89 |
80 |
81 |
87 |
*Subtest scores indicate percent correct. An overall score of 165 is required to pass.
Individual PRAXIS Scores: Class of
2009 | |||||||
Class |
PRAXIS score |
Data Based Decision
Making |
Academic Practices |
Behavioral and Mental
Health |
Consultation and
Collaboration |
Applied Psychological
Foundations |
Ethical and Legal
Considerations |
2009-01 |
189 |
79 |
100 |
84 |
93 |
100 |
79 |
2009-02 |
190 |
85 |
79 |
95 |
87 |
100 |
86 |
2009-03 |
181 |
77 |
79 |
84 |
73 |
85 |
79 |
2009-04 |
187 |
77 |
100 |
100 |
87 |
77 |
71 |
2009-05 |
187 |
85 |
64 |
89 |
80 |
92 |
93 |
2009-06 |
184 |
87 |
79 |
84 |
60 |
92 |
79 |
2009-07 |
185 |
72 |
93 |
74 |
80 |
100 |
100 |
2009-08 |
174 |
67 |
93 |
79 |
53 |
77 |
71 |
Individual PRAXIS Scores: Class of 2008 | |||||
Class |
PRAXIS score |
Diagnosis and Fact
Finding |
Applied Psychological
Foundations |
Applied Educational
Foundations |
Ethical and Legal
Considerations |
2008-01 |
790 |
77 |
93 |
96 |
76 |
2008-02 |
760 |
77 |
86 |
88 |
76 |
2008-03 |
700 |
77 |
76 |
71 |
71 |
2008-04 |
750 |
80 |
86 |
83 |
86 |
2008-05 |
790 |
73 |
97 |
88 |
86 |
2008-06 |
780 |
80 |
86 |
92 |
86 |
2008-07 |
780 |
77 |
90 |
83 |
81 |
Assessment 2 Data: Content Knowledge --
Grades
NARRATIVE
Brief Description
Knowledge in the domains of school psychology is assessed in
courses and field experiences and reflected in course grades that are determined
from the use of multiple methods, including: written tests and exams, written
reports (e.g., literature reviews, case study and psychological reports,
academic and behavioral reports, recommendations to teachers and parents, etc.),
class presentations (including a simulated in-service presentation),
faculty-critiqued videos of counseling, assessment, and consultation skills, and
classroom discussion.
Alignment with Standards.
The chart below
shows that Assessment 2 data align with content covered in the programs
required courses with each of the NASP domains. It also presents aggregated mean
grades in each course, including practica and internship, for 3 separate
cohorts. Because grades below B were rare, we chose
to report the mean only while indicating (with asterisk) when a grade below B
was given. We see no need to report grades separately for each individual
candidate since this would add no additional
information.
All 11 domains are
represented by this assessment through multiple content area course offerings
and field based experiences. See Assessment 2 data for a chart listing the
domains covered in each of the required courses. Courses are highlighted (i.e.,
with the symbol √+) that focus on specific domains. See course syllabi for courses listed in
this chart and a description of the assessments used to determined grades.
2.1 |
2.2 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
2.5 |
2.6 |
2.7 |
2.8 |
2.9 |
2.10 |
2.11 |
Course |
Class of
2009 N=8 |
Class of 2010 N=8 |
Class of 2011 N=7 |
ό |
ό |
ό |
ό |
ό |
ό+ |
ό |
ό |
ό |
ό+ |
ό |
EDUC 618 Introduction to School
Psychology |
3.96 |
3.83 |
4.00 |
ό |
|
|
ό+ |
ό |
|
ό |
|
|
ό |
|
EDUC 663 Counseling Skills Lab
|
3.96 |
3.92 |
4.00 |
ό+ |
|
ό+ |
|
ό |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDUC 817 Individual Intelligence
Testing |
4.00 |
4.00 |
3.95 |
ό+ |
ό |
ό+ |
|
|
|
|
|
ό |
|
ό |
EDUC 744 Educational Assessment and Progress
Monitoring |
4.00 |
4.00 |
4.00 |
|
|
|
ό+ |
ό |
|
ό |
|
|
|
|
EDUC 623 Applied Human Development in the
Schools |
4.00 |
4.00 |
4.00 |
ό+ |
|
|
ό+ |
ό |
|
|
|
|
|
ό |
EDUC 814 Psychological Assessment in
Children |
3.88 |
3.92 |
4.00 |
ό |
ό+ |
|
ό+ |
ό |
ό |
ό+ |
ό |
|
ό |
|
EDUC 830 Consultation and Intervention: School
Discipline (Formerly called EDUC 658 Discipline and Classroom
Management) |
3.88 |
4.00 |
4.00 |
|
|
ό |
ό |
ό |
|
ό+ |
|
|
|
|
EDUC 870 Child
Neuropsychology |
3.67 |
3.54 |
3.57 |
ό+ |
|
ό+ |
|
ό |
|
ό |
|
|
|
|
EDUC 679 Instructing Elementary and Middle
|
3.88 |
4.00 |
4.00 |
ό |
|
|
ό+ |
ό |
|
ό+ |
|
|
ό |
|
EDUC 831 Advanced Counseling Techniques
|
3.83 |
3.58 |
4.00 |
ό+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ό+ |
|
ό |
EDUC 691 Applied Statistics and Research Design
(*This course replaced EDUC 660 Educational Statistics and Measurement in
2008). |
3.79 |
3.71* |
4.00 |
ό |
|
|
ό+ |
ό |
|
ό+ |
ό |
ό |
|
|
EDUC 813 Childhood Psychopathology
|
4.00 |
4.00 |
4.00 |
ό |
ό+ |
|
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό |
ό+ |
ό |
|
ό |
|
EDUC 841 Consultation and Intervention: Mental
Health (This course was first taught in 2010. It became the second part of
EDUC 830 Consultation and Intervention). |
|
4.00 |
4.00 |
|
ό+ |
|
ό |
ό+ |
ό |
ό |
ό+ |
|
ό |
|
EDUC 651 Diversity of Family School
Collaboration (This course was entitled School-Based Family Issues and
Interventions prior to2010) |
4.00 |
3.63 |
4.00 |
ό+ |
ό |
ό+ |
ό |
ό |
ό+ |
|
ό+ |
|
ό+ |
ό+ |
EDUC 671 Practicum I in School
Psychology |
3.50* |
3.54* |
4.00 |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
EDUC 671 Practicum II in School
Psychology |
3.83 |
3.63* |
4.00 |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
EDUC 671 Practicum III in School
Psychology |
4.00 |
3.92 |
4.00 |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
ό+ |
EDUC 668 Internship in School
Psychology |
4.00 |
4.00 |
|
Key: A = 4.00; A- = 3.67; B+ =
3.33; B = 3.00; B- = 2.67; C+ = 2.33; C = 2.00; C- = 1.67
ό+ indicates domain is a primary focus of this
course
ό indicates domain is included within this
course, but is not its primary focus.
*All means reflect a grade of B or higher,
with the following exceptions:
2009 Practicum 1: one
B-
2010 EDUC 660: two
B-
Practicum 1: one
C-
Practicum II: one
B
Brief Analysis of
Data.
As reflected in mean grades shown above, which ranged from C-
to A, candidates demonstrated mastery of content knowledge in multiple courses
that address the NASP domains. More
specifically, a grade above C was obtained by all candidates in all courses with
only one exception: One candidate
received a grade of C- in EDUC 671 (first practicum, for which remediation in
report writing was necessary). Aggregated mean grades across courses ranged from
3.5 to 4.00.
Brief Interpretation as Evidence of Meeting
Standards.
Course grades of our students in courses representing each of
the NASP domains 2.1 2.11, as listed above, demonstrate that our students met
the criteria for each domain based on their superior grades. The consistently
high grades reflect that we have been able to recruit very bright and highly
motivated candidates, with average GREs of approximately 1200 and undergraduate
GPA about 3.6.
Assessment 3:
Pedagogical and Professional Knowledge,
Skills, and Disposition -- Practicum
NARRATIVE
Brief Description
The Field Experience Checklist: Planning and Evaluation Form for Practica and Internship (i.e., referred to herein as the Field Experience Checklist) is used to develop student goals for their 3 practicum experiences against which they are evaluated midterm and at the end of the semester by their site supervisors. Requirements on the use this instrument can be found in the online Program Handbook, Practicum Guidelines.
Also, note that although data are required for only two
cohorts, we report it for three because when we first began writing this report
we understood 3 years of data were required (which was true last year). Rather
than revising sections where we report 3 years of data, we decided to keep it,
thinking that this would easier for us and no hardship to
reviewers.
Alignment with
Standards
Evaluation items are aligned with the NASP domains in the
table below, which also includes the aggregated data.
Brief Analysis of
Data
Aggregated Assessment 3 data for the past three years across all items on the Field Experience Checklist are reported in the table below. Scores are reported for each of the 3 practica, using only end-of-the semester data.
In addition to high
mean ratings on these items (as seen in the attachments), results of ratings
across all items show that 100% of candidates completed the tasks adequately
(Section A items) and received either a Satisfactory or Competent rating
where skills were assessed. (Thus, we see no need to report scores for
individuals or a score other than the mean.)
Note that for items in
Section A (items that are not skill-based), a two-point score was used, with 2
denoting that the activity was completed adequately and 1 denoting inadequate
completion. For all other
sections (B-G) 1 = Unsatisfactory, 2=
Satisfactory, and 3 = Competent.
Brief Interpretation as Evidence of Meeting
Standards
High quality performance was seen
across all domains. See responses above and alignment to domains in the
table.
ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTATION
Program Handbook, Appendix A, pp
41-54
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SCORING RUBRIC WAS
RECENTLY REVISED (FALL, 2010). INSTEAD OF THE 4-POINT SCALE THAT APPEARS IN THE
HANDBOOK, THE FOLLOWING 3-POINT SCALE WAS USED FOR THE DATA PRESENTED
BELOW
0 = Not
appropriate for this placement.
1 = Unsatisfactory. (The student needs
much more practice and supervision than the majority of other students at the
same level of training).
2 = Satisfactory. (The student
demonstrates skills consistent with current level of training. It is
understood continued practice and supervision are
recommended).
3
= Competent. (The student
demonstrates mastery of this skill, requiring little, or no, additional
supervision).
|
First Practicum |
Second Practicum |
Third Practicum |
| |||||||||||
Domain 2.1:
Data-Based Decision-Making |
Class of 2010 N=7 (Spring 2008) |
Class of 2011 N=2 (Spring 2009) |
Class of 2012 N=6 (Spring 2010) |
Mean |
Class of 2009 N=8 (Fall
2007) |
Class of 2010 N=8 (Fall 2008) |
Class
of 2011 N=9 (Fall 2009) |
Mean |
Class of 2008 N=8 (Spring 2007) |
Class
of 2009 N=8 (Spring 2008) |
Class of 2010 N=8 (Spring 2009) |
Mean |
| ||
B1- Reviews student
records and obtains background information on the student's developmental
and educational history. Accurately summarizes the information,
including results of previous evaluations, where
appropriate. |
2.57 |
2.67 |
2.63 |
2.62 |
2.75 |
2.88 |
2.89 |
2.84 |
2.88 |
2.88 |
3.00 |
2.92 |
| ||
B2- Interviews teachers
and support staff and gathers information that addresses the referral
question. |
2.71 |
2.67 |
2.75 |
2.71 |
2.75 |
2.88 |
2.83 |
2.82 |
2.88 |
2.88 |
3.00 |
2.92 |
| ||
B3- Interviews parents
(personally, or by phone if necessary) and gathers information that
addresses the referral question. |
2.57 |
2.78 |
2.50 |
2.62 |
2.63 |
2.50 |
2.83 |
2.65 |
2.88 |
2.88 |
3.00 |
2.92 |
| ||
B4- Interviews the
student and gathers information that addresses the referral
question. |
2.57 |
2.78 |
2.63 |
2.66 |
2.63 |
2.50 |
2.78 |
2.64 |
2.88 |
2.88 |
3.00 |
2.92 |
| ||
B5- Observes the student
and the classroom environment and gathers information that addresses the
referral question. Employs methods of recording that are appropriate
for the targeted behavior (e.g., narrative, interval, frequency,
duration, momentary time sampling). |
2.57 |
2.67 |
2.63 |
2.62 |
2.69 |
2.63 |
2.78 |
2.70 |
2.88 |
2.88 |
3.00 |
2.92 |
| ||
B6- Where appropriate,
conducts functional behavioral assessments, as required in
IDEA. |
2.50 |
2.50 |
2.33 |
2.44 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.50 |
2.17 |
2.67 |
2.70 |
2.83 |
2.73 |
| ||
B7- Selects and uses a
variety of assessment methods that address the referral question, are
psychometrically sound, and provide an accurate and useful profile of the
student's strengths and weaknesses. |
2.57 |
2.67 |
2.63 |
2.62 |
2.63 |
2.88 |
2.83 |
2.78 |
2.75 |
2.00 |
3.00 |
2.58 |
| ||
B8- Adheres to
standardized directions and procedures when administering standardized
tests of intellectual ability. |
2.71 |
2.89 |
2.81 |
2.80 |
2.75 |
2.88 |
2.89 |
2.84 |
2.63 |
2.88 |
3.00 |
2.84 |
| ||
B9- Adheres to
standardized directions and procedures when administering standardized
tests of academic achievement. |
2.71 |
2.89 |
2.69 |
2.73 |
2.75 |
2.88 |
2.89 |
2.84 |
2.75 |
2.88 |
3.00 |
2.88 |
| ||
B10- Adheres to
standardized directions and procedures when administering standardized
measures of social and emotional functioning and adaptive behavior.
|
2.71 |
2.89 |
2.69 |
2.76 |
2.75 |
2.88 |
2.89 |
2.84 |
2.75 |
2.88 |
3.00 |
2.88 |
| ||
B11- Conducts
curriculum-based assessments in specific areas of achievement to obtain
practical, authentic information that addresses the referral
question. |
2.57 |
2.78 |
2.79 |
2.71 |
2.63 |
2.80 |
2.81 |
2.75 |
2.75 |
2.88 |
3.00 |
2.88 |
| ||
B12- Scores all tests
with accuracy |
2.71 |
2.88 |
2.64 |
2.74 |
2.88 |
2.88 |
2.88 |
2.88 |
2.75 |
2.88 |
3.00 |
2.88 |
| ||
C1- Written report
presents data clearly and accurately. |
2.43 |
2.72 |
2.79 |
2.65 |
2.63 |
2.94 |
2.78 |
2.78 |
2.63 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
2.88 |
| ||
C2- Written report
presents a clear, accurate, and useful interpretation of results of the
assessment of intellectual ability. |
2.57 |
2.89 |
2.71 |
2.72 |
2.50 |
2.88 |
2.78 |
2.72 |
2.88 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
2.96 |
| ||
C3- Written report
presents a clear, accurate, and useful interpretation of results of the
assessment of academic achievement. |
2.43 |
2.83 |
2.71 |
2.66 |
2.50 |
2.94 |
2.89 |
2.78 |
2.88 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
2.96 |
| ||
C4- Written report
presents a clear, accurate, and useful interpretation of results of the
assessment of social, emotional, and adaptive
functioning. |
2.43 |
2.33 |
2.71 |
2.49 |
2.56 |
2.69 |
2.78 |
2.68 |
2.75 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
2.92 |
| ||
C5- Written report
integrates data across multiple methods and
sources. |
2.57 |
2.33 |
2.57 |
2.49 |
2.50 |
2.94 |
2.89 |
2.78 |
2.86 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
2.95 |
| ||
C6- Written report
addresses a referral question. |
2.57 |
2.88 |
2.71 |
2.72 |
2.63 |
2.88 |
2.89 |
2.80 |
2.88 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
2.96 |
| ||
C7- Written report offers
a variety of practical interventions that address the referral question
and assessment results. |
2.57 |
2.83 |
2.57 |
2.66 |
2.56 |
2.88 |
2.89 |
2.78 |
2.88 |
3.00 |
3.00 |
2.96 |
| ||
C8- Completes report in a
timely manner. |
2.29 |
2.67 |
2.57 |
2.51 |
2.75 |
2.80 |
3.00 |